Hi,
On Monday 06 March 2017 05:12 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Hi Kishon
>
> On 03/01/2017 10:07 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tuesday 28 February 2017 01:51 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>>> Hi Kishon,
>>>
>>> On 02/28/2017 09:04 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
Hi,
On
Hi Kishon
On 03/01/2017 10:07 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday 28 February 2017 01:51 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
>> Hi Kishon,
>>
>> On 02/28/2017 09:04 AM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Monday 27 February 2017 07:40 PM, Alim Akhtar wrote:
Hi Kishon,
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
On Mon, 2017-03-06 at 13:01 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 06-03-17 11:27:33, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Sun 05-03-17 10:21:11, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > FYI next-20170303 is good while mainline is bad with this error.
> > > The attached reproduce-* may help reproduce the issue.
> >
> >
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
On 03/06/2017 03:21 PM, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
> situations.
The subject is
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
On 02/12/2017 07:49 PM, Anton Blanchard wrote:
We see lpfc devices regularly fail during kexec. Fix this by adding
a shutdown method which mirrors the remove method.
Reviewed-by: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Tested-by: Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
On Mon 06-03-17 06:35:21, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-03-06 at 13:01 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Mon 06-03-17 11:27:33, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Sun 05-03-17 10:21:11, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > > FYI next-20170303 is good while mainline is bad with this error.
> > > >
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
Peter Senna Tschudin writes:
> On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 08:24:22PM +0100, Romain Perier wrote:
>> The PCI pool API is deprecated. This commits replaces the PCI pool old
>> API by the appropriated function with the DMA pool API.
>>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Senna Tschudin
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
This series, for various different drivers, replaces atomic_t reference
counters with the new refcount_t type and API (see include/linux/refcount.h).
By doing this we prevent intentional or accidental
underflows or overflows that can led to use-after-free vulnerabilities.
The below patches are
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by: Elena Reshetova
Signed-off-by:
On Mon 06-03-17 07:44:55, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-03-06 at 16:14 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > On Mon 06-03-17 06:35:21, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2017-03-06 at 13:01 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > On Mon 06-03-17 11:27:33, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > >
Hello.
On 03/06/2017 05:20 PM, Elena Reshetova wrote:
refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
situations.
Signed-off-by:
On Sat, 4 Mar 2017 21:03:41 +
KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
> > Sent: Friday, March 3, 2017 4:50 PM
> > To: James Bottomley
> > Cc: Hannes
On Tue, 2017-03-07 at 02:03 +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Joe,
Hi again Fengguang's robot.
> [auto build test WARNING on scsi/for-next]
> [also build test WARNING on v4.11-rc1 next-20170306]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to
&g
On 03/06/2017 09:21 AM, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> refcounter overflows that might lead to use-after-free
> situations.
>
> Signed-off-by:
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Monday, March 6, 2017 8:36 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: James Bottomley ; Hannes
> Reinecke ; Christoph Hellwig
Hi Joe,
[auto build test WARNING on scsi/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.11-rc1 next-20170306]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Joe-Perches/scsi-qedf-Fix-defective
Using %llx for a dma_addr_t can lead to format/argument mismatches.
Use %pad and the address of the dma_addr_t instead.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches
---
drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_main.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Mon, 2017-03-06 at 10:17 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-03-07 at 02:03 +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > Hi Joe,
>
> Hi again Fengguang's robot.
Rehi. OK, it is a new message. Patch sent.
Sie benötigen eine Finanzierung?
Wir vergeben Darlehen. Bewerben Sie sich jetzt. Senden Sie
uns u.a. Details zurück und Sie erhalten in Kürze Antwort
Vorname:
Familienname:
Geschlecht:
Land:
Telefonnummer:
benötigter Darlehensbetrag:
Gewünschte Laufzeit:
Mit
Hi Joe,
[auto build test WARNING on scsi/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.11-rc1 next-20170306]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Joe-Perches/scsi-qedf-Fix-defective
> > I will try it, but it can't work for two reasons.
> > First, the INVALID_LUN error is masked off on INQUIRY in current code.
> > Second, the scsi_device is instantiated already as part of scan probe
> > process
> > before it gets here.
>
> Was the invalid LUN in the LUN0 position. Inquiry
On Sun, 2017-03-05 at 17:35 +0100, Sebastian Herbszt wrote:
> Just like Hannes I do favour integration. I guess it could be
> comparable to qla2xxx + tcm_qla2xxx, lpfc + lpfc_scst and
> lpfc + tcm_lpfc. That approach might even help Bart with his
> target driver unification if he didn't give up on
On Mon, 2017-03-06 at 16:14 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 06-03-17 06:35:21, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-03-06 at 13:01 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Mon 06-03-17 11:27:33, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Sun 05-03-17 10:21:11, Wu Fengguang wrote:
> > > > > FYI
On Sat, 4 Mar 2017, 8:07am -, Joe Perches wrote:
> Add __printf compiler verification of format and arguments.
> Fix fallout.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches
> ---
> drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_dbg.h | 13 -
> drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_fip.c | 2 +-
>
On Mon, 6 Mar 2017, 6:32pm -, Joe Perches wrote:
> Using %llx for a dma_addr_t can lead to format/argument mismatches.
> Use %pad and the address of the dma_addr_t instead.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches
> ---
> drivers/scsi/qedf/qedf_main.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108621
Szőgyényi Gábor (szg0...@freemail.hu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
On Mon, 2017-03-06 at 17:13 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 06-03-17 07:44:55, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-03-06 at 16:14 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > On Mon 06-03-17 06:35:21, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2017-03-06 at 13:01 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > > On Mon 06-03-17
These patches are based on Linus's tree
The changes are:
- add in a new offline volume status
- limit the number of outstanding rescan operations
- do not timeout reset operations
---
Don Brace (3):
hpsa: update check for logical volume status
hpsa: limit outstanding rescans
resets can take longer than DEFAULT_TIMEOUT
Reviewed-by: Scott Benesh
Reviewed-by: Scott Teel
Signed-off-by: Don Brace
---
drivers/scsi/hpsa.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
avoid rescan storms. No need to queue another
if one is pending.
Reviewed-by: Scott Benesh
Reviewed-by: Scott Teel
Signed-off-by: Don Brace
---
drivers/scsi/hpsa.c | 16 +++-
drivers/scsi/hpsa.h |
- Add in a new case for volume offline. Resolves internal
testing bug for multilun array management.
- Return correct status for failed TURs.
Reviewed-by: Scott Benesh
Reviewed-by: Scott Teel
Signed-off-by: Don Brace
On 03/05/2017 09:48 PM, Xiubo Li wrote:
Maybe fix this by exiting aasda() with iov pointing at the next unused
iov in the array?
May it shouldn't be the aasda()'s duty to increment the iov ptr.
Sure, your call.
[snip text where we agree current solution allows data block sharing,
and new
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 04:27:11PM +0100, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> On 03/06/2017 03:21 PM, Elena Reshetova wrote:
> > refcount_t type and corresponding API should be
> > used instead of atomic_t when the variable is used as
> > a reference counter. This allows to avoid accidental
> > refcounter
> "Arnd" == Arnd Bergmann writes:
Arnd> Without CONFIG_DEBUG_FS, we run into a link error:
Applied to 4.11/scsi-fixes.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
> "Joe" == Joe Perches writes:
Joe> Recent printk changes for KERN_CONT cause this logging to be
Joe> defectively emitted on multiple lines. Fix it.
Applied to 4.11/scsi-fixes.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
> "James" == jsmart2021 writes:
James,
James> This set of patches are mainly cleanups and fixes to the large
James> nvme post that was recently integrated. It includes a patch to
James> break the mandate for both NVME and SCSI subystems.
A couple of the patches in
> "Mauricio" == Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
> writes:
Mauricio> On 02/12/2017 07:49 PM, Anton Blanchard wrote:
>> We see lpfc devices regularly fail during kexec. Fix this by adding a
>> shutdown method which mirrors the remove method.
Mauricio> @mkp, @jejb:
> "Jiri" == Jiri Slaby writes:
Jiri> From: Tomas Jasek This patch shortens every
Jiri> init_timer in lpfc module followed by function and data assignment
Jiri> using setup_timer. This is purely cleanup patch, it does not add
Jiri> new functionality nor
> "Christoph" == Christoph Hellwig writes:
Christoph> It returns the number of vectors allocated when successful,
Christoph> so check for a negative error only.
Applied to 4.11/scsi-fixes.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Hi,
I am reaching out regarding a SCSI error handler issue, which we see
in our lab systems.
Environment: Ubuntu 4.4.0-31-generic
Issue: Write IOs are getting stuck in our system randomly. All drives
seen with the issue are all SATA drives.
Root cause: SCSI error handler is not woken up (or) it
> "Raghava" == Raghava Aditya Renukunta
> writes:
Raghava> The return status of the adapter check on KERNEL_PANIC is
Raghava> supposed to be the upper 16 bits of the OMR status register.
Applied to 4.11/scsi-fixes.
--
Martin K. Petersen
> "Joe" == Joe Perches writes:
Joe> Using %llx for a dma_addr_t can lead to format/argument mismatches.
Joe> Use %pad and the address of the dma_addr_t instead.
Applied to 4.11/scsi-fixes.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
On Mon, 2017-03-06 at 22:46 -0500, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> > > > > > "Mauricio" == Mauricio Faria de Oliveira > > > > > et.ibm.com> writes:
>
> Mauricio> On 02/12/2017 07:49 PM, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > > We see lpfc devices regularly fail during kexec. Fix this by
> >
71 matches
Mail list logo