Christoph,
On 2/14/17 15:18, h...@lst.de wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 02:21:37PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>> I think we want to keep the knowledge of which requests have a request size
>>> that should be a multiple of the logical block size in the block layer core
>>> or in the SCSI core
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 02:21:37PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> > I think we want to keep the knowledge of which requests have a request size
> > that should be a multiple of the logical block size in the block layer core
> > or in the SCSI core but not in the mpt3sas driver. But I'm not sure
Bart,
On 2/14/17 14:11, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Tue, 2017-02-14 at 13:42 +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> I think so. But my understanding of REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC is that it is the
>> type for requests issued internally (scsi_execute) of from things like
>> the SG driver, so in essence, all
On Tue, 2017-02-14 at 13:42 +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> I think so. But my understanding of REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC is that it is the
> type for requests issued internally (scsi_execute) of from things like
> the SG driver, so in essence, all requests not derived from a BIO... Is
> this correct ? If
Bart,
On 2/14/17 12:59, Bart Van Assche wrote:
>>> What software generated a ZBC_IN request with type REQ_TYPE_FS? Shouldn't
>>> all ZBC_IN requests be assigned type REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC?
>>
>> Any application that issues a BLKREPORTZONE ioctl (e.g. mkfs.f2fs or
>> libzbc tools) or kernel component
On Tue, 2017-02-14 at 12:45 +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 2/14/17 03:57, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 14:11 +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> > > The ZBC_IN command (REPORT ZONES) reply length is always a multiple of
> > > 64B and thus may not be aligned on the device LBA
Bart,
On 2/14/17 03:57, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 14:11 +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>> The ZBC_IN command (REPORT ZONES) reply length is always a multiple of
>> 64B and thus may not be aligned on the device LBA size.
>> For this command, retry due to the unaligned completion
On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 14:11 +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> The ZBC_IN command (REPORT ZONES) reply length is always a multiple of
> 64B and thus may not be aligned on the device LBA size.
> For this command, retry due to the unaligned completion length is
> incorrect so do not check alignment of
8 matches
Mail list logo
