On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:05:00PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Tue, 01/17 14:17, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 16/01/2017 18:26, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > >> Is the endianness correct for big-endian host here?
> > >
> > > I think so. The fc_host sysfs uses u64 to represent port_name and
> > >
On Tue, 01/17 14:17, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 16/01/2017 18:26, Fam Zheng wrote:
> >> Is the endianness correct for big-endian host here?
> >
> > I think so. The fc_host sysfs uses u64 to represent port_name and node_name,
> > this patch does the same, so using virtio_* helpers for these
On 16/01/2017 18:26, Fam Zheng wrote:
>> Is the endianness correct for big-endian host here?
>
> I think so. The fc_host sysfs uses u64 to represent port_name and node_name,
> this patch does the same, so using virtio_* helpers for these fields should
> handle the endianness correctly.
I was
On Tue, 01/17 03:02, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Fam,
>
> [auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
> [also build test ERROR on v4.10-rc4 next-20170116]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to
> help improve the system]
>
> url:
>
Hi Fam,
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.10-rc4 next-20170116]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
Hi Fam,
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v4.10-rc4 next-20170116]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
On Mon, 01/16 17:45, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 16/01/2017 17:04, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > + node_name = virtio_cread64(vdev,
> > + offsetof(struct virtio_scsi_config, primary_wwnn));
> > + port_name = virtio_cread64(vdev,
> > +
On 16/01/2017 17:04, Fam Zheng wrote:
> + node_name = virtio_cread64(vdev,
> + offsetof(struct virtio_scsi_config, primary_wwnn));
> + port_name = virtio_cread64(vdev,
> + offsetof(struct virtio_scsi_config, primary_wwpn));
> +
8 matches
Mail list logo
