@@ -1014,9 +1013,9 @@ static int nvme_rdma_map_data(struct nvme_rdma_queue
*queue,
}
Christoph, a little above here we still look at blk_rq_bytes(),
shouldn't that look at blk_rq_payload_bytes() too?
The check is ok for now as it's just zero vs non-zero. It's somewhat
broken for
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 10:06:51PM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>
>> @@ -1014,9 +1013,9 @@ static int nvme_rdma_map_data(struct nvme_rdma_queue
>> *queue,
>> }
>>
>
> Christoph, a little above here we still look at blk_rq_bytes(),
> shouldn't that look at blk_rq_payload_bytes() too?
The
@@ -1014,9 +1013,9 @@ static int nvme_rdma_map_data(struct nvme_rdma_queue
*queue,
}
Christoph, a little above here we still look at blk_rq_bytes(),
shouldn't that look at blk_rq_payload_bytes() too?
if (count == 1) {
- if (rq_data_dir(rq) == WRITE &&
-
This looks good,
Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
4 matches
Mail list logo