On Aug 11 2007 16:22, Casey Schaufler wrote:
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+#
+# Makefile for the SMACK LSM
+#
+
+obj-$(CONFIG_SECURITY_SMACK) := smack.o
+
+smack-y := smack_lsm.o smack_access.o smackfs.o
smack-objs :=
Added.
I should have added replace it.
+/*
+ * ' \n\0'
--- Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Entries are never deleted, although they can be modified.
The modification case still seems racy then.
Fair enough. I'll look into real list management.
Casey Schaufler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 10:48:05AM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
--- Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Entries are never deleted, although they can be modified.
The modification case still seems racy then.
Fair enough. I'll look into real list management.
You don't necessarily
--- Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 10:48:05AM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
--- Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Entries are never deleted, although they can be modified.
The modification case still seems racy then.
Fair enough. I'll look
On Aug 12, 2007, at 22:36:15, Joshua Brindle wrote:
Kyle Moffett wrote:
On Aug 12, 2007, at 15:41:46, Casey Schaufler wrote:
Your boolean solution requires more forthought than the Smack
rule solution, but I'll give it to you once you've fleshed out
your ## lines.
How does it require more
--- Kyle Moffett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
really big snip
If you have no interest in categorizing the SELinux access vectors,
then how do you expect to categorize the LSM hooks, which are almost
1-to-1 mapped with the SELinux access vectors?
Those that refer to object accesses and
