Hi Linus, Al,
Would you object greatly to functions like vfs_mkdir() gaining a security
parameter? What I'm thinking of is this:
int vfs_mkdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, int mode,
struct security *security)
Where the security context is the state
--- David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Linus, Al,
Would you object greatly to functions like vfs_mkdir() gaining a security
parameter?
Could you describe how this compares to the proposal that the
AppArmor developers suggested recently? I expect that we can
reduce the amount of
--- Stephen Smalley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2007-08-14 at 08:53 -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
--- David Howells [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Casey Schaufler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With Smack you can leave the label alone, raise CAP_MAC_OVERRIDE,
do your business of
