On Sep 19, 2007, at 08:15:53, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
Kyle Moffett wrote:
Look at it this way: What format do you use for your in-memory
datastructures? If that format is not extremely close to the
policy file format (with pointers replaced by 8-byte offsets),
then you are using the wrong
Hello.
Kyle Moffett wrote:
This is probably not acceptable; I doubt there's a chance in hell
that TOMOYO will get merged as long as it has text-based-language
parsing in the kernel. You also have $NEW_RANDOM_ABUSE_OF_PROCFS and
$PATH_BASED_LSM_ISSUES. See the long flamewars on AppArmor
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 08:25:28PM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
Hello.
Kyle Moffett wrote:
This is probably not acceptable; I doubt there's a chance in hell
that TOMOYO will get merged as long as it has text-based-language
parsing in the kernel. You also have
Hello.
Kyle Moffett wrote:
Yes, that's what securityfs is there for. Be mindful, though, that
Thank you, I see.
adding a text-based-language parser into securityfs is just as
unacceptable as adding a text-based-language parser to procfs.
Now, let me ask for some hints
regarding
Hello.
Kyle Moffett wrote:
This is probably not acceptable; I doubt there's a chance in hell
that TOMOYO will get merged as long as it has text-based-language
parsing in the kernel. You also have $NEW_RANDOM_ABUSE_OF_PROCFS and
$PATH_BASED_LSM_ISSUES. See the long flamewars on AppArmor for
