On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 01:16:02PM +, Fuchs, Andreas wrote:
> > > I was just trying to point out that the concept is not too difficult,
> > > since
> > > kernel-space (minimal) resource-manager makes a lot of people go "oh god,
> > > never ever, way too big, way too complicated", which IMHO
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 06:10:28PM +0300, Petko Manolov wrote:
> __list_splice_init_rcu() can be used to splice lists forming both stack and
> queue structures, depending on its arguments. It is based on the initial
> list_splice_init_rcu() with a few minor modifications to help abstracting it.
>
On 10/05/2015 10:41 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> Add the SELinux access control implementation for the new kdbus LSM
> hooks using the new kdbus object class and the following permissions:
>
[[SNIP]]
> diff --git a/security/selinux/include/classmap.h
> b/security/selinux/include/classmap.h
> index
> > OK, I guess we got stuck in the follow-up discussions and missed the points.
>
> Yup, don't get me wrong here. I like this discussion and am willing to
> listen to reasonable arguments.
We could not agree more. I'm always up for a good discussion... ;-)
> > My 1st point is:
> >
> > TPM1.2's
Commit 124613012db1 ("af_unix: Convert the unix_sk macro to an inline
function for type safety") was recently added to catch incorrect
uses of the unix_sk helper using compiler warnings.
It has now caught one such case in lsm_audit.c. The code is technically
correct, but as it converts a const
On Tuesday, October 06, 2015 08:55:33 PM Nicolas Iooss wrote:
> On 10/05/2015 10:41 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
> > Add the SELinux access control implementation for the new kdbus LSM
>
> > hooks using the new kdbus object class and the following permissions:
> [[SNIP]]
>
> > diff --git
Just responding to one thing at the moment:
On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 11:22:22PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> * we should phase out the usermode helper from firmware_class long term
You can "phase out", but you can not delete it as it's a user/kernel api
that we have to support for forever,
On Mon, 5 Oct 2015, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> Hi James. I'm starting my patch processing for 4.4 and wondered
> if you're planning to update security#next any time soon.
>
Now merged to -rc4.
--
James Morris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 10:08:21AM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
> Just responding to one thing at the moment:
>
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2015 at 11:22:22PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > * we should phase out the usermode helper from firmware_class long term
>
> You can "phase out", but you can not