Hi
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 05:21:02PM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Hi Jarkko,
>
> For some reason I don't see patch 1.
Weird. Well, maybe the best way to proceed is that I'll send the
contents of for-peter-v44 branch for review. It's 9 patches in total,
PPI, trusted keys and couple of bug
Hi Jarkko,
For some reason I don't see patch 1.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
linux-security-module" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Basic trusted keys support: auth value and SHA256.
v2:
* Removed all the changes that modify the existing functions to use
the new struct tpm_buf. These changes should be done separately from
this patch set as they require separate QA + review.
* 'keyhandle=' is now required for TPM2. Makes
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:11:21AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> Basic trusted keys support: auth value and SHA256.
>
> v2:
>
> * Removed all the changes that modify the existing functions to use
> the new struct tpm_buf. These changes should be done separately from
> this patch set as
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:11:21AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> * I updated tpm_buf to a be heap based structure. Now there's one full
> page of memory for variable sized messages. Also the stack is greatly
> reduced.
You may as well just use a skb then.
Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:41:20AM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 11:11:21AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>
> > * I updated tpm_buf to a be heap based structure. Now there's one full
> > page of memory for variable sized messages. Also the stack is greatly
> >
