On Wed, 2015-12-23 at 13:47 +0200, Petko Manolov wrote:
> On 15-12-22 16:50:01, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > On 12/22/2015 04:40 PM, Petko Manolov wrote:
> > >> Thanks, Sasha. By the time ima_update_policy() is called
> > >> >ima_release_policy() has already output the policy update status
> > >> >mess
On 15-12-22 16:50:01, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On 12/22/2015 04:40 PM, Petko Manolov wrote:
> >> Thanks, Sasha. By the time ima_update_policy() is called
> >> >ima_release_policy() has already output the policy update status
> >> >message. I guess an empty policy could be considered a valid policy.
>
On 12/22/2015 04:40 PM, Petko Manolov wrote:
>> Thanks, Sasha. By the time ima_update_policy() is called
>> >ima_release_policy() has already output the policy update status
>> >message. I guess an empty policy could be considered a valid policy.
>> >Could you add a msg indicating that the new po
On December 22, 2015 9:56:28 PM GMT+02:00, Mimi Zohar
wrote:
>On Tue, 2015-12-22 at 08:51 -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> Commit "IMA: policy can now be updated multiple times" assumed that
>the
>> policy would be updated at least once.
>>
>> If there are zero updates, the temporary list head objec
On Tue, 2015-12-22 at 08:51 -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Commit "IMA: policy can now be updated multiple times" assumed that the
> policy would be updated at least once.
>
> If there are zero updates, the temporary list head object will get added
> to the policy list, and later dereferenced as an I
