Greg --
Thanks. We will decide between .h and request_firmware and get you
a patch.
-- Al
Quoting Greg KH [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 02:56:42AM -0600, Al Borchers wrote:
(resend with subject)
Greg --
Multitech has 5 new ti_usb_3410_5052 devices that all need
So if you are accepting a firmware into the kernel, watch closely how
it's being used. Tracking static symbols vs. buffer's content from
request_firmware() can be harder, i think.
For things like USB the firmware question of security is pretty
irrelevant. If I can feed the device wrong
(resend with subject)
Greg --
Multitech has 5 new ti_usb_3410_5052 devices that all need
special firmware.
Is it ok to include the 5 new firmware images in the ti_usb_3410_5052
driver as .h files? Or should I use request_firmware?
Obviously including them in the driver would be easier
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 02:56:42AM -0600, Al Borchers wrote:
(resend with subject)
Greg --
Multitech has 5 new ti_usb_3410_5052 devices that all need
special firmware.
Is it ok to include the 5 new firmware images in the ti_usb_3410_5052
driver as .h files? Or should I use
Is it ok to include the 5 new firmware images in the ti_usb_3410_5052
driver as .h files? Or should I use request_firmware?
As far as i can see: userspace firmware helper is orphan, Greg
advertise himself for writing new drivers, all is working *somehow*,
it will be OK to have another
Hallo, Alan. Nice to meet you!
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 04:15:16PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
Is it ok to include the 5 new firmware images in the ti_usb_3410_5052
driver as .h files? Or should I use request_firmware?
As far as i can see: userspace firmware helper is orphan, Greg
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 02:56:42AM -0600, Al Borchers wrote:
(resend with subject)
Greg --
Multitech has 5 new ti_usb_3410_5052 devices that all need
special firmware.
Is it ok to include the 5 new firmware images in the ti_usb_3410_5052
driver as .h files? Or should I use
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 02:57:36PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 02:56:42AM -0600, Al Borchers wrote:
(resend with subject)
Greg --
[]
Is it ok to include the 5 new firmware images in the ti_usb_3410_5052
driver as .h files? Or should I use request_firmware?
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 01:27:07AM +0100, Oleg Verych wrote:
If you can proof that it doesn't influence kernel's control above system
hardware. Ironically such stuff in the userspace can give additional
intrusion way to the kernel.
Do you know of any way to use the firmware interface to the
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 04:29:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 01:27:07AM +0100, Oleg Verych wrote:
If you can proof that it doesn't influence kernel's control above system
hardware. Ironically such stuff in the userspace can give additional
intrusion way to the kernel.
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 01:56:31AM +0100, Oleg Verych wrote:
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 04:29:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 01:27:07AM +0100, Oleg Verych wrote:
If you can proof that it doesn't influence kernel's control above system
hardware. Ironically such stuff
Am Samstag, 3. März 2007 01:29 schrieb Greg KH:
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 01:27:07AM +0100, Oleg Verych wrote:
If you can proof that it doesn't influence kernel's control above system
hardware. Ironically such stuff in the userspace can give additional
intrusion way to the kernel.
Do
12 matches
Mail list logo
