Dear All,
I have read through the USB OTG Specifications.
I have understood the USB OTG leaves very less to the part of Software.
Most of it is handled in the hardware i.e. in the el electrical and
mechanical characteristics.
But, I found that there was no clear statement mentioning whether the
Dear USB Linux Team,
I have just bought the USB Complete II Edition book at a near by store.
In the near by market, I did not find the USB Complete III Edition book.
Can someone please suggest me what is the difference between these?
Can I safely follow the USB Complete II Edition?
Regards,
Dear Linux USB Devels,
I have studied the USB Specifications document till the chapter 5 i.e
USB data flow model and bit and pieces of rest of the Spec.
Being a novice to USB protocol, I have a set of few queries. Please help
me clear those.
1) Transfer means transfer of data between the host
Thanks Alan,
I am very thankful for your patient responses.
Regards,
Mukund Jampala
-Original Message-
From: Alan Stern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2006 8:45 PM
To: Mukund JB.
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Randy.Dunlap
Subject: RE: [linux-usb-devel] RE: Analyze the USB
Dear Alan,
On Tue, 28 Feb 2006, Mukund JB. wrote:
Dear Alan,
I am not speaking about the 'Max Transfers' instead I am talking
about
the MAX bottom most row. I did not understand how is max bandwidth
jumped to 187500 value.
I understand it suggests that it supports (187500*8) = 1.5Mb/s
Dear Alan,
Thanks for the response.
I am not speaking about the 'Max Transfers' instead I am talking
about
the MAX bottom most row. I did not understand how is max bandwidth
jumped to 187500 value.
I understand it suggests that it supports (187500*8) = 1.5Mb/s
data
rate.
Looks
Dear All,
I am trying to design a USB stack of my own and I am writing for my own
Real time OS.
I have read through the USB 2.0 Specifications and am not able to
understand the last row i.e MAX row in the low-speed control transfer
Limits table. (Table 5.1)
I understand it suggests that it
(Usefull data)
Max 187500 187
Regards,
Mukund Jampala
-Original Message-
From: Alan Stern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 8:50 PM
To: Mukund JB.
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Randy.Dunlap
Subject: Re
Dear All,
I am looking to the USB Specifications now. At the same time I am
referring to the Linux USB implementation.
In 5.12.2 USB Clock model,
Function device clocks are Sample Clock
USB Host controller runs at Bus Clock i.e 1Khz (full speed) 8Khz (high
speed) devices
What is Service
Dear Alan,
I find nothing in the mail content. Can you please resent the mail.
Regards,
Mukund Jampala
From: Alan Stern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 9:41 PM
To: Mukund JB.
Cc: Randy.Dunlap; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL
is against the
above rule in 5.5.3.
Regards,
Mukund Jampala
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 04:21, Mukund JB. wrote:
Dear All,
Please help me perform my case study over USB Host Hardware
general
stack Architecture. My idea is to understand the Hardware.
I would like to explore the complete
Andrea,
Where is the example code?
I guess you missed the attachment.
Header and structure are not clear. Please add clarity.
Or else paste in the pastebin site below and forward me the link.
http://pastebin.com
Regards,
Mukund Jampala
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Also Andrea,
If the Function device is MASS storage compliant, you will not require
any additional driver.
Just plugin and you will be able to mount the Flash drive on the Linux
Box.
Mukund Jampala
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:linux-usb-devel-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Jampala
On Thu, 2006-02-09 at 04:21, Mukund JB. wrote:
Dear All,
Please help me perform my case study over USB Host Hardware
general
stack Architecture. My idea is to understand the Hardware.
I would like to explore the complete USB Host side stack. I have
seen
the Linus written early
, The USB 1.1 Devices which are unaware of SRP HNP cannot
communicate with OTG HOSTs. Is this right or wrong?
Please elaborate on this?
Regards,
Mukund Jampala
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:linux-usb-devel-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mukund JB.
Sent: Monday
David,
Wrong. It just means they're not OTG devices. If the OTG host
isn't powering VBUS at all times -- why would it? -- then you'd
rely on the fact that it's powered at least briefly after the
ID pin gets grounded by the Mini-A connector. So the end-user
scenario would be to connect
Dear all,
I am confused. Who defines the register Interface of USB?
I am sure it is not defined in USB specifications.
I think they are defined by Intel (UHCI EHCI) Compaq (OHCI).
But, then why does the USB Specifications mention the statement below in
3.1 Goals for the Universal Serial Bus.
Hi Greg,
I would like to explore more on the protocol side how the OTG can
be
made to work with existing USB Host stack.
Try reading those documents. Any _specific_ questions that you have
with our implementation, please let us know.
I am right now reading through the OTG
Dear All,
I am trying to settle some more clarification regarding the USB devices.
Can someone please clarify the following?
1) OHCI UHCI are the interfaces developed which with USB 1.1 devices.
2) EHCI is interfaces developed which with USB 2.0 devices. So, if it is
USB 2.0 Host controller,
What is the license for this proprietary OS?
It is open source license.
As I am relatively new to USB architecture, would you please provide
me any information on USB OTG Stack development.
Have you read the USB OTG spec?
I am reading the On-The-Go Supplement to the USB 2.0 Specification
What is the license for this proprietary OS?
It is open source license.
Nice, which one is it? Any pointers to it?
It is a very small OS. Right now, It is meant only for a calculator it
works on.
Have you read the two different specs?
Which do you the second spec is?
The main USB spec,
Nice, which one is it? Any pointers to it?
It is a very small OS. Right now, It is meant only for a calculator
it
works on.
Any pointers to where the source code can be found?
No, the OS is just like a small firmware kind of thing which responds to
the bottons on the calculator. Just like
Sorry for the siily mistake.
Regards,
Mukund Jampala
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Neukum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 3:51 PM
To: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Mukund JB.
Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Why double locking the usb
like to know how is OTG stack different from USB HOST stack?
Thanks Regards,
Mukund Jampala
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Neukum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 18, 2006 3:51 PM
To: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Mukund JB.
Subject: Re: [linux-usb
Dear All,
I made an attempt to understand the USB driver sample code in usb-skeleton.c
file /drivers/usb.
I found in the probe function there are two reference counts being maintained.
One is through usb_get_dev() and the other one is kref_init().
Is this kind of reference count implementation
Dear USB Devels,
I have a requirment of supporting the USB HI-SPEED 2.0 finger print
authentication device on 2.6 range of kernels.
I have a working windows driver for this device I would require to just port
the code to Linux, just by developing simple USB Interfaces.
I want the device to
fops. I will write
test a small scull driver and post back to you.
Regards,
Mukund Jampala
-Original Message-
From: Oliver Neukum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 8:21 PM
To: linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Mukund JB.
Subject: Re: [linux-usb
27 matches
Mail list logo
