[linux-usb-devel] Re: [2.5 patch] let USB_GADGET depend on USB

2003-06-02 Thread David Brownell
Adrian Bunk wrote: On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 04:39:28PM -0700, David Brownell wrote: Adrian Bunk wrote: USB_GADGET is still selectable even with USB disabled. It seems the following is intended: This is wrong. CONFIG_USB has always represented the master/host side ... while CONFIG_USB_GADGET

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [2.5 patch] let USB_GADGET depend on USB

2003-06-02 Thread Greg KH
On Sun, Jun 01, 2003 at 07:18:54AM -0700, David Brownell wrote: As I had already said (in response to your email that reported that problem), the fix is to revert the recent changeset that links gadget code twice. Here's a patch that undoes it. Yeah, that was my fault, sorry. I didn't see

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [2.5 patch] let USB_GADGET depend on USB

2003-06-01 Thread David Brownell
Adrian Bunk wrote: USB_GADGET is still selectable even with USB disabled. It seems the following is intended: This is wrong. CONFIG_USB has always represented the master/host side ... while CONFIG_USB_GADGET represents just the slave/gadget side. The two are completely independent. Hardware

[linux-usb-devel] Re: [2.5 patch] let USB_GADGET depend on USB

2003-06-01 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 04:39:28PM -0700, David Brownell wrote: Adrian Bunk wrote: USB_GADGET is still selectable even with USB disabled. It seems the following is intended: This is wrong. CONFIG_USB has always represented the master/host side ... while CONFIG_USB_GADGET represents just