On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 08:24:37PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Quoting Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:42:00AM +0100, Ben Wootton wrote:
> > > I've been trying to get a USB micro drive to work under Linux. I'm seeing
> > the
> > > usual error of "USB device di
Quoting Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:42:00AM +0100, Ben Wootton wrote:
> > I've been trying to get a USB micro drive to work under Linux. I'm seeing
> the
> > usual error of "USB device did not accept new address (error: 110)" which
> > lots of people seem to get.
>
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 11:42:00AM +0100, Ben Wootton wrote:
> I've been trying to get a USB micro drive to work under Linux. I'm seeing the
> usual error of "USB device did not accept new address (error: 110)" which
> lots of people seem to get.
It's a interrupt routing problem. See the FAQ f
Hi there,
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Ben Wootton wrote:
> scsi_register_module is undefined.
I *think* this is because you need to upgrade modutils, maybe someone
can confirm that? I have a vague recollection of coming across the
same problem when I moved to 2.5 kernels. Unfortunately my notes are
a
I've been trying to get a USB micro drive to work under Linux. I'm seeing the
usual error of "USB device did not accept new address (error: 110)" which
lots of people seem to get.
I noticed that usb-storage isn't loaded. However, when I try to insmod
usb-storage, I see the following error:
s