Hi,
Fedora core 2 is going to be a demand. Two things::
1st, 256 meg of mem is the realistic minimum of memory for X/KDE etc.
Fc2 will run on 160 or so megs, but it will have little rests every
now and then. (what I found on FC2 test 3)
disk space, the new full install is 6.5 gigs.
Are the any problems with dual boot, windows + FC2 I saw that there was
a posting on /. about this today.
Does anyone know anything about this?
On Mon, 2004-05-24 at 11:16, Derek Smithies wrote:
Hi,
Fedora core 2 is going to be a demand. Two things::
1st, 256 meg of mem is the realistic
On Saturday 22 May 2004 5:56 pm, Don Gould wrote:
Section Screen
Identifier Screen0
Device Videocard0
MonitorMonitor0
DefaultDepth 16
SubSection Display
Depth 16
Modes1024x768 800x600 640x480
Don, there will be useful information in /var/log/XFree86.0.log
On Sat, 2004-05-22 at 17:56, Don Gould wrote:
Last night I got in to some late night googleing and turned up some
info...
see: http://www.oceanpark.com/notes/sony_vaio_pcg-z505js.html
(search for heading: Day 2 )
I
That much I knew to do before I even started with google.
It just ignored it.
Cheers Don
On Sat, 2004-05-22 at 18:14, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
On Saturday 22 May 2004 5:56 pm, Don Gould wrote:
Section Screen
Identifier Screen0
Device Videocard0
Monitor
At 2004-05-22T175659+1200, Don Gould wrote:
HorizSync31.5 - 37.9
You need to increase the maximum hsync. Try 48.5, or go find out
exactly what your display supports.
Cheers,
-mjg
--
Matthew Gregan |/
/|[EMAIL
On Sat, 2004-05-22 at 20:31, Matthew Gregan wrote:
At 2004-05-22T175659+1200, Don Gould wrote:
HorizSync31.5 - 37.9
You need to increase the maximum hsync. Try 48.5, or go find out
exactly what your display supports.
Cheers,
-mjg
I concur, It is quite obvious from the log file
Hi Nick,
Thanks for your help (and others).
I'll give the sync thing a go.
As for finding information... I don't take your comments the wrong way,
I guess I made my google search a bit spicific - I included the model
number and got data for my machine that way.
The reason I posted all the
Thank you to everyone who helped.
I changed the hsync and vsync after looking at what was set on the first
web site I found.
I've also learnt more about the structure of the XConfig86 file thou I
still don't understand all the dependencies and references in that file
properly yet.
Thanks for
As you can see I'm now posting from my Sony Laptop with RH9 installed.
My first big issue is that my screen res seems to be 800*600.
The install program only give me option for 640*480 or 800*600
The Windows Sony configuration program says I have 3mb of video ram.
There was no option to set
try ctl +alt and either the Minus key or the Plus key on the numeric pad.
I fine i have to do this sometimes when i have done a reinstall in the past.
My monitor is a 14¨ AOC int. and an´t supported by MS 98se / MDK / AOC.
Monitor type is a CM-335 and have CM 320 or something else in both MDK
On Friday 21 May 2004 21:05, Don Gould wrote:
I've installed KDE and have no idea what I should do to get the screen
fixed.
Where should I start?
K - Settings - Peripherals - Display.
--
Sincerely etc.
Christopher Sawtell
NB. This PC runs Linux. If you find a virus apparently from me,
it
I've tried editing the values in XF86Config and changed the 'modes' line
in the display subsection to include 1024x768
This didn't seem to have any impact.
How do I even identify that this file is the one being used as the
configuration?
I also ran the display program in kde which shows me
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 21:14, dave wrote:
try ctl +alt and either the Minus key or the Plus key on the numeric pad.
I'm using a Sony PCG-Z505JE laptop. It doesn't have a numeric pad.
I fine i have to do this sometimes when i have done a reinstall in the past.
My monitor is a 14 AOC int.
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 21:35, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
On Friday 21 May 2004 21:05, Don Gould wrote:
I've installed KDE and have no idea what I should do to get the screen
fixed.
Where should I start?
K - Settings - Peripherals - Display.
By 'K' I assume you mean the Red Hat that's
On Friday 21 May 2004 21:05, Don Gould wrote:
Think about how quickly you want to help me fix this I'll be asking
how I get windows 98 se running in a window next
http://www.vmware.com/
http://www.netraverse.com/products/win4lin50/
--
Sincerely etc.
Christopher Sawtell
NB. This PC runs
Hi Don,
Welcome back! :-)
RH9 is somewhat old. Twice replace with newer releases (FC1 and, as
of this week, FC2). But that said, I'm posting from a RH9 machine right
now...
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 10:44, Don Gould wrote:
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 21:35, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
On Friday 21 May
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 21:57, Don Gould wrote:
Thanks,
I haven't fixed the graphic problem yet.
At present I'm looking at a very stretched screen which is very
annoying.
Is vmware gpl/free?
www.vmware.com for licensing costs.
Cheers Don
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 21:47, Christopher
then try the minus button right of Zero (eg 890-+) and then + on a normal
qwerty keyboard.
dave
On Fri, 21 May 2004 21:40, you wrote:
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 21:14, dave wrote:
try ctl +alt and either the Minus key or the Plus key on the numeric pad.
I'm using a Sony PCG-Z505JE laptop. It
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 21:57, HHV wrote:
Welcome back! :-)
Thank you.
RH9 is somewhat old. Twice replace with newer releases (FC1 and, as
of this week, FC2). But that said, I'm posting from a RH9 machine right
now...
And how much more deman is FC2 going to put on my hardware?
Are the
I tried that before I posted the last message.
The Sony has an embedded keyboard with in the qwerty keyboard but I
can't for the life of me figure out how to make that work either.
I'm loving the filter options in this mail reader thou!!! :)
Cheers Don
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 22:03, dave wrote:
The Sony has an embedded keyboard with in the qwerty keyboard but I
can't for the life of me figure out how to make that work either.
Embedded meaning you press function and make the alternate silk-screened
items work (num pad?)?
That is a driver issue, and I very much doubt that Sony
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 22:08, Don Gould wrote:
And how much more deman is FC2 going to put on my hardware?
If you are concerned about your hardware coping (and your resolution
problems) and you obviously have a fresh installation, I would recommend
ditching RedHat and installing Mandrake 10.
Don Gould wrote:
On Fri, 2004-05-21 at 21:57, HHV wrote:
RH9 is somewhat old. Twice replace with newer releases (FC1 and, as
of this week, FC2). But that said, I'm posting from a RH9 machine right
now...
And how much more deman is FC2 going to put on my hardware?
Check min'specs online at
Last night I got in to some late night googleing and turned up some
info...
see: http://www.oceanpark.com/notes/sony_vaio_pcg-z505js.html
(search for heading: Day 2 )
I also looked at this link...
http://larve.net/people/hugo/2000/07/linux-vaio#x
and this link...
25 matches
Mail list logo
