Re: Swat

2004-04-16 Thread Dale Anderson
/me accidentally vomits in his breakfast ;p Dale. - Original Message - From: Andy George [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 2:30 PM Subject: Re: Swat Little sideline diversion here without trying to upset the list... Swat is cool, and incredibly

RE: swat

2004-04-15 Thread David Kirk
Roger, When I try http://127.0.0.1:901/ in mozilla I get the document contains no data. Do you have a web server (eg. Apache) installed and running? Later David Kirk

Re: swat

2004-04-15 Thread Roger Searle
David Kirk wrote: Roger, When I try http://127.0.0.1:901/ in mozilla I get the document contains no data. Do you have a web server (eg. Apache) installed and running? Installed, yes - as I'm thinking apache is required learning at some stage in the near future. As for running,

RE: swat

2004-04-15 Thread David Kirk
Roger, Do you have a web server (eg. Apache) installed and running? Installed, yes - as I'm thinking apache is required learning at some stage in the near future. As for running, I've not done anything deliberately to run it - how would I tell if it's running? (there I go again,

Re: swat

2004-04-15 Thread Dale Anderson
#/etc/init.d/apache status --- could be apache2 httpd depending on distro ... Cheers Dale. - Original Message - From: Roger Searle [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 1:42 PM Subject: Re: swat David Kirk wrote: Roger, When I try http

Re: swat

2004-04-15 Thread Nick Rout
In relation to packages, redhat always broke samba into multiple bits, samba-common, samba-server, samba-swat etc. you installed the bits you wanted. you may not have originally installed the samba-swat file. Now on to the problem: I assume xinetd is started? #service xinetd status [1] if

RE: swat

2004-04-15 Thread Fisher, Robert (FXNZ CHC)
IIRC RedHat package for swat is called samba-swat I find ksambaplugin to be even easier to use. Give that a try. Regards, Robert Some days you are the pigeon, some days you are the statue. -Original Message- From: Roger Searle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, 16 April 2004

RE: swat

2004-04-15 Thread Fisher, Robert (FXNZ CHC)
PROTECTED] Subject:Re: swat David Kirk wrote: Roger, When I try http://127.0.0.1:901/ in mozilla I get the document contains no data. Do you have a web server (eg. Apache) installed and running? Installed, yes - as I'm thinking apache is required learning at some stage

RE: swat

2004-04-15 Thread David Kirk
Roger, Another thing to check is your /etc/services file. There should be a line like this in there: swat901/tcp Later David Kirk

Re: Swat

2004-04-15 Thread Andy George
Little sideline diversion here without trying to upset the list... Swat is cool, and incredibly helpful, but... Seen WEBMIN lately? ( www.webmin.com ) Andy George Linux Worshipper, and follower of the guru's like a bad smell...

Re: swat

2004-04-15 Thread Col
David Kirk wrote: Roger, Do you have a web server (eg. Apache) installed and running? Installed, yes - as I'm thinking apache is required learning at some stage in the near future. As for running, I've not done anything deliberately to run it - how would I tell if it's running?

Re: swat

2004-04-15 Thread Roger Searle
Got it working. I was following http://geekspeek.org/modules.php?name=Newsfile=articlesid=7 http://geekspeek.org/modules.php?name=Newsfile=articlesid=7 and the 2 other links at the same time and they contradict each other a bit. I got confused at the stage of editing the correct

RE: swat

2004-04-15 Thread David Kirk
I just tried it and you don't seem to need apache running. Oops. Sorry to put you on the wrong track with the apache thing. I'm glad you got it sorted in the end. Later David Kirk