On Friday 29 August 2003 8:50 pm, someone claiming to be Kurt Wall wrote:
Quoth burns:
A couple of days ago, my ISP instituted a blackhole of (read = refused
to accept) traffic from this list. This was based upon an arbitrary
listing issued by a vigilante group in the Netherlands. Their
A couple of days ago, my ISP instituted a blackhole of (read = refused
to accept) traffic from this list. This was based upon an arbitrary
listing issued by a vigilante group in the Netherlands. Their rationale
was that the SxS listserver uses DHCP, and many rogue spam servers also
employ DHCP.
On Thu, 2003-08-28 at 22:29, burns wrote:
A couple of days ago, my ISP instituted a blackhole of (read = refused
to accept) traffic from this list. This was based upon an arbitrary
listing issued by a vigilante group in the Netherlands. Their rationale
was that the SxS listserver uses DHCP,
On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 00:45, Myles Green wrote:
ack! I hope not the same one I use?
No. It was Istop.com, a small regional DSL provider (re-selling surplus
Bell bandwidth) and who was supposed to be Linux-friendly.
--
burns
___
Linux-users mailing
to still participate in the list until
my new, less anal, ISP comes on line. A big public thank you, to both
these guys.
Yes, kudos to all. I suffer from a similar problem. The xfce list
maintainer blocks all ip addresses from my ISP. Even if I could send
mail to complain (which I can't), I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
burns shocked and awed us all by speaking:
listing issued by a vigilante group in the Netherlands. Their rationale
was that the SxS listserver uses DHCP, and many rogue spam servers also
employ DHCP. What utter BS - that's like banning the use of
Douglas J Hunley wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
burns shocked and awed us all by speaking:
listing issued by a vigilante group in the Netherlands. Their rationale
was that the SxS listserver uses DHCP, and many rogue spam servers also
employ DHCP. What utter BS - that's like
