Re: [LinuxBIOS] [BUILDROM] Very minor fixes to make it easier to use custom ELF payloads

2007-11-29 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071129 00:16]: [BUILDROM] Very minor fixes to make it easier to use custom ELF payloads Some fixes to make it easier to use a custom ELF payload. Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- coresystems

[LinuxBIOS] Booting Windows with QEMU+LinuxBIOS

2007-11-29 Thread Jun Koi
Hello, I am playing around with LinuxBIOS. The first step is to boot Windows on QEMU+LinuxBIOS. I follow the steps in http://www.linuxbios.org/Booting_Windows_using_LinuxBIOS, and do with LinuxBIOSv3. However, in the documentation, I read: . Building LinuxBIOSv3 Now it is time to build

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Booting Windows with QEMU+LinuxBIOS

2007-11-29 Thread Jun Koi
Hmm... I managed to do like this: - Compile ADLO separately, then I have a file named payload - In LinuxBIOSv3, I run make menuconfig, then specify the path of payload option to the above payload. - Save options, quit and compile. As a result, I have build/bios.bin, and I overwrites this file

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] v3: big arch/x86/stage1.c and lib/lar.c cleanup

2007-11-29 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071128 00:52]: Consolidate all multiple segment handling into lib/lar.c:load_file_segments() and greatly simplify arch/x86/stage1.c code as a result. While I'm at it, improve the LAR segmentation abstraction. Stage 1 code should not have to care

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] v3: reorder rules in mainboard/*/*/Makefile

2007-11-29 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071128 01:20]: Reorder the rules in mainboard/*/*/Makefile so their order is identical across all of these makefiles. The rules are now in order of execution during boot, that is: STAGE0_MAINBOARD_OBJ INITRAM_OBJ STAGE2_MAINBOARD_OBJ As added

Re: [LinuxBIOS] License header missing in util/flashrom/layout.c

2007-11-29 Thread Stefan Reinauer
Alex Beregszaszi wrote: On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 22:02 +0200, Alex Beregszaszi wrote: Hi, the subject says it all. The missing header in udelay.c was added a few days ago, this should not be missed. Attached patch fixes it. According to svn blame, initial author was the user

Re: [LinuxBIOS] License header missing in util/flashrom/layout.c

2007-11-29 Thread Alex Beregszaszi
On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 12:29 +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote: Alex Beregszaszi wrote: On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 22:02 +0200, Alex Beregszaszi wrote: Hi, the subject says it all. The missing header in udelay.c was added a few days ago, this should not be missed. Attached

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] LAR verison field

2007-11-29 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
On 29.11.2007 09:57, Stefan Reinauer wrote: * Alex Beregszaszi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071129 02:30]: Signed-off-by: Alex Beregszaszi [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please commit. Are we still in favor of this? If yes I will commit it

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Remove Bitworks IMS

2007-11-29 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
On 29.11.2007 01:14, Richard Smith wrote: Great. I'll have reason to do some linuxbios hacking soon. I purchased some GIGABYTE GA-M57SLI-S4 setups to build a Multi-TB RAID server. Parts should arrive next week. One goes into service with stock BIOS to get going ASAP and the other gets

Re: [LinuxBIOS] r2991 - trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/src/mainboard/iwill/dk8_htx

2007-11-29 Thread Stefan Reinauer
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: On 29.11.2007 03:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: uwe Date: 2007-11-29 03:28:55 +0100 (Thu, 29 Nov 2007) New Revision: 2991 Modified: trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/src/mainboard/iwill/dk8_htx/Config.lb Log: Flashrom does not work after booting LinuxBIOS on the

[LinuxBIOS] Interesting.

2007-11-29 Thread Feng, Libo
Hi, all, In our board, we found the trace is sent out: Issuing SOFT_RESET… from the function init_cpus in the file init_cpus.c. But when the function runs, the serial port is still far to be initialized, how dose the trace is sent out? Best Regards 丰立波 Feng Libo @ AMD Ext: 20906 Mobile

[LinuxBIOS] r2993 - in trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets: msi/ms9185 msi/ms9282 supermicro/h8dmr

2007-11-29 Thread svn
Author: stepan Date: 2007-11-29 16:01:53 +0100 (Thu, 29 Nov 2007) New Revision: 2993 Added: trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets/msi/ms9282/Config-abuild.lb trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets/supermicro/h8dmr/Config-abuild.lb Modified: trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/targets/msi/ms9185/Config-abuild.lb Log: fix abuild.

[LinuxBIOS] r2993 build service

2007-11-29 Thread LinuxBIOS information
Dear LinuxBIOS readers! This is the automated build check service of LinuxBIOS. The developer stepan checked in revision 2993 to the LinuxBIOS source repository and caused the following changes: Change Log: fix abuild. Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer

Re: [LinuxBIOS] r2991 - trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/src/mainboard/iwill/dk8_htx

2007-11-29 Thread Uwe Hermann
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 02:39:30PM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote: Signed-off-by: Mondrian Nuessle [EMAIL PROTECTED] Acked-by: mcq [EMAIL PROTECTED] Short question: Do we require real names for Acked-by or is that just a requirement for Signed-off-by? I vote for both. Me too, but

[LinuxBIOS] r65 - buildrom-devel

2007-11-29 Thread svn
Author: jcrouse Date: 2007-11-29 16:56:37 +0100 (Thu, 29 Nov 2007) New Revision: 65 Modified: buildrom-devel/Makefile Log: [BUILDROM] Add targets for mconf and lxdialog There isn't any need to be running make for mconf and lxdialog every time we run menuconfig - we invoke the power of Make

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Add targets for mconf and lxdialog

2007-11-29 Thread Jordan Crouse
On 29/11/07 00:46 +0100, Peter Stuge wrote: On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 04:13:49PM -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote: [BUILDROM] Add targets for mconf and lxdialog There isn't any need to be running make for mconf and lxdialog every time we run menuconfig - we invoke the power of Make and add the

[LinuxBIOS] r66 - in buildrom-devel: config/payloads packages/memtest

2007-11-29 Thread svn
Author: jcrouse Date: 2007-11-29 16:57:34 +0100 (Thu, 29 Nov 2007) New Revision: 66 Modified: buildrom-devel/config/payloads/Config.in buildrom-devel/packages/memtest/memtest.mk Log: [BUILDROM] Move to memetest86 version 3.4 Memtest86 version 3.4 has some fun new tricks, like understanding

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Move to memtest86 version 3.4

2007-11-29 Thread Jordan Crouse
On 29/11/07 01:00 +0100, Peter Stuge wrote: On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 04:14:56PM -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote: [BUILDROM] Move to memetest86 version 3.4 Memtest86 version 3.4 has some fun new tricks, like understanding multiple CPUs. Also use the correct name in the config.in - its

[LinuxBIOS] r67 - buildrom-devel/packages/linuxbios

2007-11-29 Thread svn
Author: jcrouse Date: 2007-11-29 16:58:26 +0100 (Thu, 29 Nov 2007) New Revision: 67 Modified: buildrom-devel/packages/linuxbios/ga-2761gxdk-linuxbios.mk buildrom-devel/packages/linuxbios/generic-linuxbios.mk buildrom-devel/packages/linuxbios/linuxbios.inc

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Very minor fixes to make it easier to use custom ELF payloads

2007-11-29 Thread Jordan Crouse
On 29/11/07 09:53 +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote: * Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071129 00:16]: [BUILDROM] Very minor fixes to make it easier to use custom ELF payloads Some fixes to make it easier to use a custom ELF payload. Signed-off-by: Jordan Crouse [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[LinuxBIOS] r68 - buildrom-devel/packages/linuxbios

2007-11-29 Thread svn
Author: jcrouse Date: 2007-11-29 16:59:26 +0100 (Thu, 29 Nov 2007) New Revision: 68 Added: buildrom-devel/packages/linuxbios/optionroms.inc Modified: buildrom-devel/packages/linuxbios/ga-2761gxdk-linuxbios.mk buildrom-devel/packages/linuxbios/generic-linuxbios.mk Log: [BUILDROM] Download

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Download and prepend the VGA VBIOS for the ga-2761gxdk

2007-11-29 Thread Jordan Crouse
On 29/11/07 00:48 +0100, Peter Stuge wrote: On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 04:18:11PM -0700, Jordan Crouse wrote: [BUILDROM] Download and prepend the VGA VBIOS for the ga-2761gxdk First try at downloading and prepending the VGA VBIOS for the ga-2761gxdk board stored on linuxbios.org. This

Re: [LinuxBIOS] flashrom fails on GA-M57SLI with 1MB ROM

2007-11-29 Thread Andreas B. Mundt
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 07:33:46PM -0500, Richard Smith wrote: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: OK, then we probably have either partial chip protection (by setting some bits in the chip) or partial mapping. Is this an SPI part? Pretty much all recent SPI parts have block protect

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Interesting.

2007-11-29 Thread Marc Jones
Feng, Libo wrote: Hi, all, In our board, we found the trace is sent out: Issuing SOFT_RESET… from the function init_cpus in the file init_cpus.c. But when the function runs, the serial port is still far to be initialized, how dose the trace is sent out? Best Regards 丰立波 Feng

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] LAR verison field

2007-11-29 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071129 14:32]: Alex, can you repost an updated patch? I want to verify that patch against a suggestion of Peter Stuge from Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:06:50 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] What is that suggestion? -- coresystems GmbH •

Re: [LinuxBIOS] flashrom fails on GA-M57SLI with 1MB ROM

2007-11-29 Thread Ward Vandewege
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 05:34:38PM +0100, Andreas B. Mundt wrote: No, it's the PLCC32 revision. It's strange that it seems to work for Ward. Ward, which board revision do you have? Yep, works fine for me, same chip. My board says it's rev 1.1; it's plcc. (But Ward's board showed some

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] LAR verison field

2007-11-29 Thread Peter Stuge
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 05:41:52PM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote: Alex, can you repost an updated patch? I want to verify that patch against a suggestion of Peter Stuge from Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:06:50 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] What is that suggestion?

Re: [LinuxBIOS] flashrom fails on GA-M57SLI with 1MB ROM

2007-11-29 Thread Andreas B. Mundt
Yep, works fine for me, same chip. My board says it's rev 1.1; it's plcc. So this might be the reason: I have rev 1.0 :-( ... It worked sometimes, now it works always thanks to Carl-Daniel's work :) Note: For the 512kB chip it worked for me too (after Carl-Daniel's patch). Thanks,

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Remove Bitworks IMS

2007-11-29 Thread Richard Smith
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: For SPI flash size, the limitation is not how much the chipset can support, but how much the SPI translation feature in the IT8716F can support. Are you talking about LCP reads - SPI reads translation? If so I only need that for the initial boot. After that I

[LinuxBIOS] State of the buildrom

2007-11-29 Thread Jordan Crouse
We've been doing a lot of hacking on buildrom lately. Thanks to everybody, especially Ward and Myles. I wanted to take some time to discuss where we are and particularly where we want to go. Here is where we are: * v2 support for 10 platforms (alix1c, db800, dbe61, ga-2761gxdk, m57sli,

[LinuxBIOS] Broken build for kexec-boot-loader in buildrom x86_64?

2007-11-29 Thread Andreas B. Mundt
Hi all, buildrom gives me still an error when building kexec-boot-loader (x86_64) for the m57sli: gcc --32-c -o kexec/x86-setup-32.o kexec/x86-setup-32.S cc1: error: unrecognized command line option -f32 This has been reported for the tyan_s2891 before:

Re: [LinuxBIOS] License header missing in util/flashrom/layout.c

2007-11-29 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Alex Beregszaszi [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071129 14:01]: Ollie checked in code written by me, see http://tracker.linuxbios.org/trac/LinuxBIOS/log/trunk?rev=2111 So it's (C) coresystems GmbH Okay, this one? -- Alex Signed-off-by: Alex Beregszaszi [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Remove Bitworks IMS

2007-11-29 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
On 29.11.2007 19:34, Richard Smith wrote: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: For SPI flash size, the limitation is not how much the chipset can support, but how much the SPI translation feature in the IT8716F can support. Are you talking about LCP reads - SPI reads translation? Yes. If so I

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] LAR verison field

2007-11-29 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
On 29.11.2007 18:13, Peter Stuge wrote: On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 05:41:52PM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote: Alex, can you repost an updated patch? I want to verify that patch against a suggestion of Peter Stuge from Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:06:50 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [LinuxBIOS] State of the buildrom

2007-11-29 Thread ron minnich
jordan, for SiS we really need to get the point of having an normal/fallback LAB payload that runs in 2 MB, one MB for each one. how hard is this? Does buildrom do fallback in general? I thought it did not. I still don't know how to do fallback/normal on v3 ... ron -- linuxbios mailing list

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] v3: big arch/x86/stage1.c and lib/lar.c cleanup

2007-11-29 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
Remove .o suffix from parsed ELF files in the LAR. Build tested and runtime tested in Qemu. Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index: LinuxBIOSv3-betterparsedelfnaming/lib/lar.c === ---

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH v3] v2, v3: Bug? in CAR setup with CacheSize!={4k, 8k, 16k}

2007-11-29 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
On 29.11.2007 00:50, Marc Jones wrote: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: On 28.11.2007 23:52, Marc Jones wrote: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: Marc? This has been sitting in my tree for a while now. On 16.11.2007 16:00, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: Hi, v2 and v3 have almost identical CAR

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH v3] v2, v3: Bug? in CAR setup with CacheSize!={4k, 8k, 16k}

2007-11-29 Thread Marc Jones
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: Everything is set up correctly until now. /* enable caching for 16K/8K/4K using fixed mtrr */ movl$0x269, %ecx /* fix4k_cc000*/ #if CacheSize == 0x4000 movl$0x06060606, %edx /* WB IO type */ #endif #if CacheSize == 0x2000

Re: [LinuxBIOS] State of the buildrom

2007-11-29 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
On 29.11.2007 22:58, ron minnich wrote: I still don't know how to do fallback/normal on v3 ... The current v3 fallback/normal code is less than optimal. In case normal boot is specified, it will die() unless normal/initram and normal/stage2 are found. So even in the presence of

[LinuxBIOS] [PATCH v3] v2, v3: Bug in CAR setup with CacheSize!={4k, 8k, 16k}

2007-11-29 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
On 29.11.2007 23:58, Marc Jones wrote: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: Everything is set up correctly until now. /* enable caching for 16K/8K/4K using fixed mtrr */ movl$0x269, %ecx /* fix4k_cc000*/ #if CacheSize == 0x4000 movl$0x06060606, %edx /* WB IO type

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] LAR verison field

2007-11-29 Thread Stefan Reinauer
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: Together with reserving space at the end of the header. I think especially the space reservation is important because it allows use of feature flags without having to horrible re-definition/out-of-place-information hacks. Space reservation? What is this

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH v3] v2, v3: Bug in CAR setup with CacheSize!={4k, 8k, 16k}

2007-11-29 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
On 30.11.2007 01:19, Marc Jones wrote: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: On 29.11.2007 23:58, Marc Jones wrote: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: Everything is set up correctly until now. /* enable caching for 16K/8K/4K using fixed mtrr */ movl$0x269,

Re: [LinuxBIOS] State of the buildrom

2007-11-29 Thread Jordan Crouse
On 29/11/07 13:58 -0800, ron minnich wrote: jordan, for SiS we really need to get the point of having an normal/fallback LAB payload that runs in 2 MB, one MB for each one. how hard is this? Does buildrom do fallback in general? I thought it did not. buildrom doesn't do fallback in

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] LAR verison field

2007-11-29 Thread Peter Stuge
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 12:43:51AM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote: Together with reserving space at the end of the header. Space reservation? What is this about? Some extra bytes for future use, the more bytes the longer before we need to change the format. I think 64 would be more than

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] LAR verison field

2007-11-29 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
On 30.11.2007 00:43, Stefan Reinauer wrote: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: Together with reserving space at the end of the header. I think especially the space reservation is important because it allows use of feature flags without having to horrible re-definition/out-of-place-information

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH v3] v2, v3: Bug in CAR setup with CacheSize!={4k, 8k, 16k}

2007-11-29 Thread ron minnich
Has this been tested on hardware? CAR is black magic ;-) ron -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.linuxbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH v3] v2, v3: Bug in CAR setup with CacheSize!={4k, 8k, 16k}

2007-11-29 Thread Marc Jones
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: On 29.11.2007 23:58, Marc Jones wrote: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: Everything is set up correctly until now. /* enable caching for 16K/8K/4K using fixed mtrr */ movl$0x269, %ecx /* fix4k_cc000*/ #if CacheSize == 0x4000 movl

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Remove Bitworks IMS

2007-11-29 Thread Richard Smith
Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: If so I only need that for the initial boot. After that I can issue SPI read commands directly to the device. Which is a little bit slow/inefficient. I suspect that using a USB storage device (together with early USB initialization) will give you better

[LinuxBIOS] Multi-TB fileserver

2007-11-29 Thread Richard Smith
I've had a couple of questions on what I'm doing and if this multi-TB server is a commercial product... So I'm posting the response to the list. I'm still working hard at OLPC. My @laptop.org address isn't on the linuxbios list. The fileserver project is personal. - I've got a large amount

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Can't compile flashrom: SOLVED

2007-11-29 Thread Shocky
On Sunday 25 November 2007 09:24, Shocky wrote: Hi, I'm new to LinuxBios, and just looking for a way to flash the bios on an HP laptop without installing Windoze. None of the tricks I've found through Google have worked for me so far, including HP's own utility for making bootable usb keys.

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH v3] v2, v3: Bug in CAR setup with CacheSize!={4k, 8k, 16k}

2007-11-29 Thread Carl-Daniel Hailfinger
On 30.11.2007 01:12, ron minnich wrote: Has this been tested on hardware? CAR is black magic ;-) I have no hardware capable of running LinuxBIOS (except a few OLPC machines with Geode GX, but they use a different CAR setup). Besides that, testing this code in v3 is rather difficult because

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Can't compile flashrom: SOLVED

2007-11-29 Thread Stefan Reinauer
Shocky wrote: I finally tracked down the problem, and it had nothing to do with libpci.a or libzlib1.a, except for the fact that static linking is used. Mandriva, both 2007 and 2008, has a package called glibc-static-devel which is required to do static linking. I guess this is the first

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Improved Intel 82371EB (and others) support

2007-11-29 Thread Žiga Mlinar
On Friday 30 November 2007 02:39:25 Uwe Hermann wrote: See patch. This is required to make all 440BX based boards in v2 almost fully supported. Without the patch at least the Super I/O init is never performed, thus lots of stuff is broken. Uwe. Works here on Azza/PT-6IBD. With this patch

[LinuxBIOS] USB booting in LinuxBIOS

2007-11-29 Thread Uwe Hermann
[New thread] On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 08:25:32PM -0500, Richard Smith wrote: That said, here in the OLPC offices we have still have periodic pain involved with USB booting. A lot of usb sticks are just trash. The generic case requires up to several seconds of delay before you can access

[LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Improved Intel 82371EB (and others) support

2007-11-29 Thread Uwe Hermann
See patch. This is required to make all 440BX based boards in v2 almost fully supported. Without the patch at least the Super I/O init is never performed, thus lots of stuff is broken. Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org |

[LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] TeleVideo TC7020 support

2007-11-29 Thread Kenji Noguchi
Hi Attached is a patch for TeleVideo TC7020 support. It should work fine with r2993. Please kindly review. Large part of the patch is just a duplicate of BCOM Winnet100 patch hence many files retain copyright holder as Juergen Beisert. My TC7020 runs Debian's unmodified kernel 2.6.18, and

Re: [LinuxBIOS] USB booting in LinuxBIOS

2007-11-29 Thread Jordan Crouse
On 30/11/07 03:33 +0100, Uwe Hermann wrote: [New thread] On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 08:25:32PM -0500, Richard Smith wrote: That said, here in the OLPC offices we have still have periodic pain involved with USB booting. A lot of usb sticks are just trash. The generic case requires up to

[LinuxBIOS] Flashrom support for NVidia MCP51?

2007-11-29 Thread Shocky
Now that I can build and run flashrom, I get: Calibrating delay loop.. OK. No LinuxBIOS table found. Found chipset NVidia MCP51, enabling flash write... OK generic_spi_command called, but no SPI chipset detected No EEPROM/flash device found. I see on the supported devices list that NVidia MCP55

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Interesting.

2007-11-29 Thread Feng, Libo
Hi, all, But the function init_cpus is called before the three functions: w83627hf_enable_serial(SERIAL_DEV, TTYS0_BASE); uart_init(); console_init(); The trace is sent out from the init_cpus. Best Regards 丰立波 Feng Libo @ AMD Ext: 20906 Mobile Phone: 13683249071 Office Phone:

[LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] IDE legacy port access + UDMA/33 for 440BX boards

2007-11-29 Thread Uwe Hermann
See patch. At the very least the IDE legacy port access must be enabled to be able to use FILO. The rest is optional, but I see no reason to not enable it per default. Uwe. -- http://www.hermann-uwe.de | http://www.holsham-traders.de http://www.crazy-hacks.org |

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Improved Intel 82371EB (and others) support

2007-11-29 Thread Uwe Hermann
On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 02:50:31AM +0100, Stefan Reinauer wrote: Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, r2994. Not sure about the USB controller part. It does nothing, yet, does it? Good question. This needs some more testing, but I _think_ Linux just enables the USB ports

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] LAR verison field

2007-11-29 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Carl-Daniel Hailfinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071130 01:19]: That way we can introduce new header fields and still have old LAR code parse new archives without any problems. What about just adding a field with the header size for that. Adding space for empty reserved fields just smells like a

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] Improved Intel 82371EB (and others) support

2007-11-29 Thread Stefan Reinauer
* Uwe Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] [071130 02:39]: Improve support for the Intel 82371FB/SB/AB/EB/MB southbridge(s): - Implement ISA related support: - Initialize the RTC - Enable access to all BIOS regions (but _not_ write access to ROM) - Enable ISA (not EIO) support - Without

[LinuxBIOS] r2994 - trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/src/southbridge/intel/i82371eb

2007-11-29 Thread svn
Author: uwe Date: 2007-11-30 03:08:26 +0100 (Fri, 30 Nov 2007) New Revision: 2994 Added: trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/src/southbridge/intel/i82371eb/i82371eb_isa.c trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/src/southbridge/intel/i82371eb/i82371eb_reset.c trunk/LinuxBIOSv2/src/southbridge/intel/i82371eb/i82371eb_usb.c

[LinuxBIOS] [PATCH] buildrom: add preliminary gpxe support

2007-11-29 Thread Ward Vandewege
See attached. Thanks, Ward. -- Ward Vandewege [EMAIL PROTECTED] Free Software Foundation - Senior System Administrator This patch adds preliminary gPXE support to buildrom. gPXE is the successor of etherboot. It is currently undergoing some major work and does not have LinuxBIOS support, so

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Interesting.

2007-11-29 Thread Feng, Libo
Yes, our board reboots for some reason. The function print_debug and other functions must still be located where they had been located last time and all configuration related with serial port is still OK since the reboot, then without the serial port initialization, init_cpus can sent out

Re: [LinuxBIOS] Interesting.

2007-11-29 Thread yhlu
On Nov 29, 2007 9:25 PM, Feng, Libo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, all, But the function init_cpus is called before the three functions: w83627hf_enable_serial(SERIAL_DEV, TTYS0_BASE); uart_init(); console_init(); The trace is sent out from the init_cpus. that is for next fail reboot. YH

Re: [LinuxBIOS] [PATCH v3] v2, v3: Bug in CAR setup with CacheSize!={4k, 8k, 16k}

2007-11-29 Thread yhlu
my own tree have #if CacheSize 0x8000 /* enable caching for 16K/8K/4K using fixed mtrr */ movl$0x269, %ecx /* fix4k_cc000*/ #if CacheSize == 0x4000 movl$0x06060606, %edx /* WB IO type */ #endif #if CacheSize == 0x2000 movl$0x0606, %edx