#31: Do proper checking for flash erase for SST FWH parts
-+--
Reporter: stepan| Owner: stepan
Type: defect|Status: closed
Priority:
#31: Do proper checking for flash erase for SST FWH parts
---+
Reporter: stepan | Owner: stepan
Type: defect | Status: assigned
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 12:22:41AM +0100, Peter Stuge wrote:
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 11:39:03PM +0100, Uwe Hermann wrote:
Well, that's a matter of taste. I have to delete whole _threads_ of
duplicated mails all the time, just because I replied to a single mail
in that thread. WTF? I'm
#31: Do proper checking for flash erase for SST FWH parts
---+
Reporter: stepan | Owner: stepan
Type: defect | Status: new
#31: Do proper checking for flash erase for SST FWH parts
+---
Reporter: stepan | Owner: stepan
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Instead of checking the first byte only, the whole part is checked
now.
This will detect any improper erase. The patch removes a FIXME. :-)
... and adds one, heh :-)
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The patch never made it to the mailing list. To review the
patch I now
* Segher Boessenkool [EMAIL PROTECTED] [061105 21:40]:
The patch never made it to the mailing list. To review the
patch I now have to:
I contacted the trac folks for that problem. Attachments should make it
into notification mails.
Don't take this as a flame, I just need a working working
* Richard Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] [061105 22:03]:
Stefan Reinauer wrote:
Patch management on the mailing list just does not work. It never will.
The Linux Kernel guys seem to think otherwise.
1. There are _lots_ of people hired full time to check no patches get lost.
2. Patches still
#31: Do proper checking for flash erase for SST FWH parts
---+
Reporter: stepan | Owner: stepan
Type: defect | Status: assigned
