Re: [LinuxBIOS] #33: Signed-off-by in trac is meaningless

2006-11-07 Thread LinuxBIOS
#33: Signed-off-by in trac is meaningless --+- Reporter: segher | Owner: somebody Type: defect | Status: new Priority: critical |

Re: [LinuxBIOS] #33: Signed-off-by in trac is meaningless

2006-11-05 Thread LinuxBIOS
#33: Signed-off-by in trac is meaningless +--- Reporter: segher | Owner: somebody Type: defect | Status: new Priority: critical|

Re: [LinuxBIOS] #33: Signed-off-by in trac is meaningless

2006-11-05 Thread Luis Correia
On 11/5/06, LinuxBIOS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: #33: Signed-off-by in trac is meaningless +--- Reporter: segher | Owner: somebody Type: defect | Status: new Priority:

Re: [LinuxBIOS] #33: Signed-off-by in trac is meaningless

2006-11-05 Thread LinuxBIOS
#33: Signed-off-by in trac is meaningless +--- Reporter: segher | Owner: somebody Type: defect | Status: new Priority: critical|

Re: [LinuxBIOS] #33: Signed-off-by in trac is meaningless

2006-11-05 Thread LinuxBIOS
#33: Signed-off-by in trac is meaningless +--- Reporter: segher | Owner: somebody Type: defect | Status: new Priority: critical|

Re: [LinuxBIOS] #33: Signed-off-by in trac is meaningless

2006-11-05 Thread LinuxBIOS
#33: Signed-off-by in trac is meaningless +--- Reporter: segher | Owner: somebody Type: defect | Status: new Priority: critical|

Re: [LinuxBIOS] #33: Signed-off-by in trac is meaningless

2006-11-05 Thread LinuxBIOS
#33: Signed-off-by in trac is meaningless +--- Reporter: segher | Owner: somebody Type: defect | Status: new Priority: critical|

Re: [LinuxBIOS] #33: Signed-off-by in trac is meaningless

2006-11-05 Thread ron minnich
We have to have something like trak. If trak is not it then let's pick something better. But don't underestimate how hard the problem is, or how hard stefan has thought about this :-)ron -- linuxbios mailing list linuxbios@linuxbios.org http://www.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxbios