Eh?
--
This too shall pass.
-Original Message-
From: Rony [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2008 21:10:44
To:GNU/Linux Users Group, Mumbai, India linuxers@mm.glug-bom.org
Subject: [ILUG-BOM] Testing
Hello Hello Hello Mike Testing 1 2 3 4 5 Hello Hello.
--
Regards,
Rony.
Sorry for the top post. (blackberry again.)
Kill the offending program, ofcourse.
--
This too shall pass.
-Original Message-
From: Mohan Nayaka [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2008 18:21:35
To:GNU/Linux Users Group, Mumbai, India linuxers@mm.glug-bom.org
Subject: Re: [ILUG-BOM]
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 12:34 +0530, jtd wrote:
Agreed agreed. We cant shoot our messengers - except on the list ;- ).
Oh, they're not shot but flamed to a crisp :)
Extreme patience and a request to highlight the freedom aspect (in
the form of some smart soundbyte) when dealing with an
list-admin, top post is on account of lousy closed source nokia software.
Apologies.
Rishi,
Is the following line of thought valid?
Opyum - OPM - offline package manager
-gabin
--
This too shall pass.
-Original Message-
From: Vihan Pandey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007
On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 15:59 +0530, alpesh gajbe wrote:
On 10/28/07, krishnakant Mane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the entire mis understanding started when the comments came on the
glug instead of on the rediff page where the rediff guys are most
likely to see. that is what my colligue
On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 11:58 +0530, jtd wrote:
Also methinks Krishankant is quite tuned in to the GNU and freedom
aspects.
without prejudice
Being tuned in and being able to tune an indifferent media person are
quite different.
/without prejudice
-gabin
--
this too shall pass.
--
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 15:07 +0530, Vihan Pandey wrote:
it would be more interesting if there was less ad-hominem involved.
if you are referring to me spreading ad-hominem :-) its a natural
reaction when opposing parties become over defensive and self
aggrandising. IMHO.
I was not
On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 14:21 +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On 26-Oct-07, at 2:02 PM, Dinesh Shah wrote:
On 10/26/07, Vihan Pandey wrote:
On 10/25/07, krishnakant Mane wrote:
Both of you can work this out off-line?
why? I am enjoying the debate
it would be more interesting if
On Thu, 2007-10-18 at 16:09 +0530, Rony wrote:
jtd wrote:
But to each his own poison. And everytime somebody makes a blanket
statement based on arbitary criteria i will jump at them.
You started it all with your blanket statements about software that
don't run in Linux.
On Wed, 2007-10-17 at 07:13 +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On 16-Oct-07, at 7:27 PM, Gabin Kattukaran wrote:
List out your requirements and we'll (or at leat, I'll ) set it up
for you with a word of honour that your install will run without
any hicouhgs for a mutually agreed pre
On Mon, 2007-10-15 at 17:40 +0530, jtd wrote:
Precisely not. The mistake that the op and many others in this thread
are making is trying to compare one set of tools with another set of
tools without an inkling of the motives, goals and design criteria.
Having similiar features to MY
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 22:05 +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
Hi,
I was just wondering; do NGOs in India look at FOSS as an alternative
for cost-cutting at all? Has anyone on-list succeeded in introducing
FOSS in any NGO-aided school or vocational training centre?
Somewhere along the way an
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 22:20 +0530, Rony wrote:
What was the knowledge that Microsoft did not give you? As far as I
know, it has a lot of documentation available about the working of
Microsoft systems and their various settings.
I don't think Microsoft (or any closed source setup) ever gave
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 00:02 +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
I was actually thinking on the lines of FOSS software for vocational
training schools for the poor. I know someone who works in an NGO that
supports low-budget schools. These schools have basic computer
training for their students.
On Wed, 2007-01-17 at 11:53 +0530, Dinesh Joshi wrote:
I too used to think it sucked. But as of today its faster than kmail.
Thats just probably because I'm using Gnome right now instead of KDE.
But surely someone should be using evolution, right? Or am I the only
one??? =P
I use evolution
On Thu, 2007-01-11 at 15:20 +0530, Vihan Pandey wrote:
ilug bom is a far more diverse list in terms of opinions, belief's, action
and motive compared to fsf.in which has a singular well defined agenda as
defined by their philosophical standpoint and its own action plan for the
same.
so, are
On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 19:13 +0530, Mrugesh Karnik wrote:
UUOC :P
That means Useless Use Of Cat :P
echo Siddhesh is more efficient than cat Siddhesh ;)
Actually, since 'cat' 'echo' do two different things, you really can't
say that. 'cat' assumes that Siddhesh is a file. 'echo'
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 13:40 +0530, Vihan Pandey wrote:
HA HA. Guess wot. got a licenced copy of windows xp media edition and
installed on my debian media center box. HELP i am crossing over to
the dark side.
May the force be with you :-)
That should be - May the _Source_ be with you!
On Sat, 2007-01-06 at 02:31 -0800, Koustubha Kale wrote:
--- Dilip Khanolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/6/07, Koustubha Kale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Whats the reason Apple is not becoming a OS vendor
and
letting people like Dell sell its OS X?
as per my knowledge till
On Fri, 2007-01-05 at 19:56 +0530, krishnakant Mane wrote:
On 05/01/07, Dhawal Doshy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Unfortunately 21st is a 'not in bombay' situation for me, so maybe next
month.
in that case we can have it on 28th jan if there is no other venue.
and then feb glug meet can be in
On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 17:14 +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On 03-Jan-07, at 4:41 PM, Gabin Kattukaran wrote:
most of their time in a desktop environment, it's actually more
sensible
to use the desktop's name - Gnome, KDE, XFCE etc. To me it appears
to be
the quickest way
On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 17:44 +0530, Gabin Kattukaran wrote:
Of the lot, I think the Ubuntu family does best in expressing
orientation - the various flavours clearly identifying them. As for the
others, how different (from a user experience point of view) is Gnome
running on Debian (note
On Wed, 2007-01-03 at 19:58 +0530, Dhawal Doshy wrote:
Philip Tellis wrote:
Sometime Today, DD cobbled together some glyphs to say:
i use fvwm.. you insensitive clod!!
if you use fvwm, you must have really thick skin. I don't believe
insensitivity would get to you.
Umm no
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 11:45 +0530, jtd wrote:
People call freesoftware opensource. Now that is crude and deep
sacrilege too boot. Some even accused god of begging for credit.
For the humour challenged and deeply singed by the roaring flames that
is a joke. Honest.
You know, it's quite
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 11:22 +0530, Dhawal Doshy wrote:
Vihan Pandey wrote:
If you fit the requirements and are interested, then send me your
profile preferably in plaintext (but .doc and .odt are welcome as well).
i find it HIGHLY OFFENSIVE that you are encouraging the use of a .doc
On Tue, 2006-12-12 at 16:52 +0530, krishnakant Mane wrote:
hello all,
this may or may not be considered off topic.
actually the subject line seams to be off topic but this is some thing
to do with a program I am writing which needs to send emails out of
the box.
I want to know if imap is
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 15:34 +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
On 08-Nov-06, at 1:31 PM, പ്രവീണ്|Praveen wrote:
PS: Did you mean I should have used gNewSense GNU/Linux in my mail?
yes - linux needs to be credited
Given that most proponents of linux don't bother with distribution of
credit,
On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 14:25 +0530, Jojumon Kavalan wrote:
Hi,
CDAC Mumbai wants to get some of its staff members to get trained
in Linux kernel internals and programming. Any pointers to good
institutions/individuals who provide such training?
It's a sad day when this institution looks
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 10:22 +0530, Faraz Shahbazker wrote:
On 10/12/06, Roshan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps, we have exercised our ``freedom of speech'',
to the best of our abilities. There have been only
arguments and no consensus on why 'GNU/Linux' or
'Linux'.
Let us give a new
On Fri, 2006-09-29 at 14:55 +0530, Rony wrote:
So for Linux compatibility, a fully branded pc is required.
hi,
I think you're missing the point here. Getting a fully functional box
requires you to spend - either money or time+effort.
This is independent of your OS choice. When you buy a
On Thu, 2006-09-28 at 15:30 +0530, Devdas Bhagat wrote:
On 28/09/06 15:18 +0530, Gabin Kattukaran wrote:
hi,
I think you're missing the point here. Getting a fully functional box
requires you to spend - either money or time+effort.
This is independent of your OS choice. When you
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 21:20 +0530, Rony wrote:
All your inputs are most welcome. What I am observing is that linux
experts/gurus are not parting with information of the hardware they use.
Its is as if its top secret. I wonder why.
Regards,
Rony.
Don't most distros maintain hardware
On Thu, 2006-08-31 at 20:08 +0530, Rony wrote:
This system would be a local setup and need not be linked to a map. GPS
may not give information of foot bridges, subways and other local
structures.
Your setup may be local and you may choose to manually configure each of
the many transmitters
On Mon, 2006-08-21 at 14:56 +0530, Aparna Appaiah wrote:
On Sat, Aug 19, 2006 at 10:56:03AM +0530, Rohit V Bhute wrote:
To answer the original question, the only you can avoid downloading read
mails is by moving them to Trash.
So, I beleive there are only two ways to avoid this. One is
On Wed, 2006-08-16 at 19:10 +0530, Nagarjuna G. wrote:
I wish to add something here, something I learned in my graduate
courses in Philosophy some 12 years ago. There is an expression
called 'evening star', and another called 'morning star'. They both
refer to the same thing, namely the
On Sun, 2006-07-23 at 21:22 +0530, Devdas Bhagat wrote:
On 23/07/06 19:45 +0530, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote:
snip
even monks have to pay service tax
No. That service comes under the heading of charity, for which you get a
tax deduction.
You would still needd to file your returns and
On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 12:46 +0530, jtd wrote:
I have never faced discrimination / religious slur even from hardcore
members of RSS and Shiv sena ever even tho i am from a miniority
religious community and i do not subscribe to much of their ideology
and have said so bluntly. I am therfore
On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 18:34 +, Dinesh Joshi wrote:
On Sunday 16 July 2006 15:01, Mr. Prasanta Baruah wrote:
If you modify your /etc/sudoers file to
username ALL = NOPASSWD: ALL
Dangerous! Extremely dangerous!!
Dangerous doesn't do it justice. More like - insane!
-gabin
-- War is
38 matches
Mail list logo
