giveup_vsx didn't save the FPU and VMX regsiters. Change it to be
like giveup_fpr/altivec which save these registers.
Also update call sites where FPU and VMX are already saved to use the
original giveup_vsx (renamed to __giveup_vsx).
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
benh:
On Friday 11 July 2008, prodyut hazarika wrote:
I have a version which just keeps a count of bytes copied till any
fault happened. Then for any exception, I just substract this value
from the total number of bytes to be copied, and store in r3 and
return back. This is the common fixup code for
Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Hans, hi Milton,
snip
One could make a superio driver, and create sub-devices for the IR,
I2C, floppy, parallel, etc
nodes.
There have been proposals to do this, and this would indeed be a very
good idea, but unfortunately nobody took the time to implement this
* Milton Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rusty, Ingo.
Rusty's patch [PATCH 3/3] stop_machine: use cpu mask rather than magic
numbers didn't find kernel/trace/ftrace.c in -next, causing an
immediate almost NULL pointer dereference in ftrace_dynamic_init.
Rusty - what's going on here?
Hi Chirag,
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 21:35:43 +0530 Chirag Jog [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
This patch fixes various paths in the -rt kernel on powerpc64 where per_cpu
variables are accessed in a preempt unsafe way.
When a power box with -rt kernel is booted, multiple BUG messages are
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Milton Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rusty, Ingo.
Rusty's patch [PATCH 3/3] stop_machine: use cpu mask rather than magic
numbers didn't find kernel/trace/ftrace.c in -next, causing an
immediate almost NULL pointer dereference in
On Friday 11 July 2008 03:57:53 Nathan Fontenot wrote:
Hello Chandru,
static int __init early_init_dt_scan_drconf_memory(unsigned long node)
{
- cell_t *dm, *ls;
+ cell_t *dm, *ls, *endp, *usm;
unsigned long l, n, flags;
u64 base, size, lmb_size;
+ char buf[32],
On Friday 11 July 2008 17:46:03 Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Milton Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Rusty, Ingo.
Rusty's patch [PATCH 3/3] stop_machine: use cpu mask rather than magic
numbers didn't find kernel/trace/ftrace.c in -next, causing an
immediate almost NULL pointer dereference in
Scan for linux,usable-memory properties in case of dynamic reconfiguration
memory. Support for kexec/kdump.
Signed-off-by: Chandru Siddalingappa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Patch applies on linux-next tree (patch-v2.6.26-rc9-next-20080711.gz)
arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c | 40
Hi All,
Can you review OF files which I have in microblaze pack for linux-next?
Patch is available at
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2008/7/8/2387284
Thanks,
Michal Simek
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:34:43PM -0700, John Linn wrote:
Review comments were incorporated to improve the driver.
1. Some data was eliminated that was not needed.
2. Renaming of variables for clarity.
3. Removed unneeded type casting.
4. Changed to use dev_err rather than other I/O.
5.
Firstly kernel warns at set_irq_chip, and then dies completely:
Trying to install chip for IRQ-1
[ cut here ]
Badness at c00463b0 [verbose debug info unavailable]
NIP: c00463b0 LR: c00463b0 CTR: c0158e80
REGS: cf821cd0 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:36:58PM -0400, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Jul 9, 2008, at 1:22 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Convert i2c-mpc to an of_platform driver. Utilize the code in
drivers/of-i2c.c to make i2c modules dynamically
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 09:48:59PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Firstly kernel warns at set_irq_chip, and then dies completely:
Trying to install chip for IRQ-1
[ cut here ]
Badness at c00463b0 [verbose debug info unavailable]
[..]
Unable to handle kernel paging
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 09:48:59PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Firstly kernel warns at set_irq_chip, and then dies completely:
Trying to install chip for IRQ-1
diff --git a/drivers/of/of_i2c.c b/drivers/of/of_i2c.c
index b2ccdcb..95a24de 100644
--- a/drivers/of/of_i2c.c
+++
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:12:14PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:36:58PM -0400, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Jul 9, 2008, at 1:22 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Jon Smirl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Convert i2c-mpc to an of_platform driver. Utilize
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 10:45:56PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:12:14PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:36:58PM -0400, Timur Tabi wrote:
On Jul 9, 2008, at 1:22 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Jon Smirl
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 12:23:23PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 09:48:59PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Firstly kernel warns at set_irq_chip, and then dies completely:
Trying to install chip for IRQ-1
diff --git a/drivers/of/of_i2c.c b/drivers/of/of_i2c.c
index
Hi Grant,
What is the reason that info.irq is set to -1 in the first place? This
looks like another bug to me. Does something in the i2c layer depend on
the -1 value?
Nope, it was a bug in the i2c documentation fixed recently:
Hi Anton,
diff --git a/drivers/of/of_i2c.c b/drivers/of/of_i2c.c
index b2ccdcb..95a24de 100644
--- a/drivers/of/of_i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/of/of_i2c.c
@@ -93,10 +93,8 @@ void of_register_i2c_devices(struct i2c_adapter *adap,
if (info.irq == NO_IRQ)
info.irq
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 09:01:10PM +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
Hi Grant,
What is the reason that info.irq is set to -1 in the first place? This
looks like another bug to me. Does something in the i2c layer depend on
the -1 value?
Nope, it was a bug in the i2c documentation fixed
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 09:11:02PM +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
Hi Anton,
diff --git a/drivers/of/of_i2c.c b/drivers/of/of_i2c.c
index b2ccdcb..95a24de 100644
--- a/drivers/of/of_i2c.c
+++ b/drivers/of/of_i2c.c
@@ -93,10 +93,8 @@ void of_register_i2c_devices(struct i2c_adapter
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 11:19:30PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 09:11:02PM +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
Shouldn't this be:
if (info.irq != NO_IRQ)
Maybe, maybe not. See
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/11/21/211
I.e. maybe we should use if (irq). Or
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 03:18:13PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 11:19:30PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 09:11:02PM +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
Shouldn't this be:
if (info.irq != NO_IRQ)
Maybe, maybe not. See
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 01:46:14AM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 03:18:13PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 11:19:30PM +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 09:11:02PM +0200, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
Shouldn't this be:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 06:07:54PM -0400, Sylvain Lamontagne wrote:
Greetings
We are currently trying to put a Kernel 2.6.26 on a custom board based
on the MPC5200 processor and the designed of the board was based on the
lite5200b evaluation board.
We would like to have some advice
Greetings
We are currently trying to put a Kernel 2.6.26 on a custom board based
on the MPC5200 processor and the designed of the board was based on the
lite5200b evaluation board.
We would like to have some advice regarding the installation process for
this kernel. The hardware currently work
From: Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Linux now supports the MPC5121 part and is handled by the same
maintainer. Update MAINTAINERS to reflect this. Also remove URLs
which do not work or contain out of date information.
Signed-off-by: Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
MAINTAINERS |4 +---
Push the sync below the secondary smp init hold loop and comment its purpose.
This should speed up boot by reducing global traffic during the single-threaded
portion of boot.
Signed-off-by: Sonny Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Milton Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Documentation/powerpc/booting-without-of.txt | 142 +---
Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/fsl/pmc.txt | 63 +++
2 files changed, 163 insertions(+), 42 deletions(-)
create mode 100644
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/fsl/tsec.txt | 31 +--
1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/fsl/tsec.txt
b/Documentation/powerpc/dts-bindings/fsl/tsec.txt
index
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c |3 +
drivers/net/gianfar.c | 118 -
drivers/net/gianfar.h | 12 -
drivers/net/gianfar_ethtool.c | 41 +-
include/linux/fsl_devices.h |
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8313erdb.dts | 241 +++--
1 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8313erdb.dts
b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8313erdb.dts
index 3664fb5..2a94ae0
Basic PM support for 83xx. Standby is implemented as sleep.
Suspend-to-RAM is implemented as deep sleep (with the processor
turned off) on 831x.
Signed-off-by: Scott Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
arch/powerpc/Kconfig |2 +-
arch/powerpc/platforms/83xx/Makefile |1
What is your intent with the 'master' branch? I hope you do NOT plan
on ever rebasing it. I assume if a patch gets into master and we drop
it you'll do a git-revert of it?
I'll try as much as possible. But I'll keep the option open. next is
the one that should never be rebased I'd say.
Are you *sure* you can see all 4GB? I thought we lost some of the 32-
bit PCI address space for PCI IO.. Disclaimer: I'm no expert on
PCI :)
You are right. I didn't think that through when I replied. We do lose
some of it for MMIO (not IO). So we cannot really go all the way to 4G
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 01:30:58PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
What is your intent with the 'master' branch? I hope you do NOT plan
on ever rebasing it. I assume if a patch gets into master and we drop
it you'll do a git-revert of it?
I'll try as much as possible. But
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 09:18 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
If you want to use your master branch as a place for experimental
stuff, that's fine by me. But you'll want to keep next separate from
it so it's as clean as possible for those trying to track what is
definitely going into the next
On Fri, 2008-07-11 at 21:01 +0200, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Since I haven't heard back from Ben [1] on ide-pmac/media-bay IRQ issue
I took another look at ide-pmac patches and I think that it should be
possible to rework them in such way that consecutive ide patches ( 100)
won't
On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 11:02:23PM -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:
On 7/2/08, Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Grant Likely [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This patch adds support for populating an SPI bus based on data in the
OF device tree. This is useful for powerpc platforms which use the
40 matches
Mail list logo
