On Monday 12 January 2009, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
* Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl [2009-01-11 01:08:19]:
On Friday 02 January 2009, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
Hi,
2.6.28-git4 kernel drops to xmon with kernel expection. Similar kernel
expection was seen next-20081230 and
I wish to unsubscribe from this list.
Best Regards,
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Best regards
Ulrich Kunkel
Produktlinie Testing Abteilung T-GE
Hottinger Baldwin Messtechnik GmbH
Fax:+49 6151-803524
E-Mail: ulrich.kun...@hbm.com blocked::mailto:v...@hbm.com
Internet:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:42:56 +
赵赵萍 zhaoping_1...@hotmail.com wrote:
anyone has any idea how to quit this maillist?
It's at the end of each message:
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
// Simon
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Now I understand why people don't read unsubscription info on mailing list.
They don't read their own signatures ;-)
Yep. You need some company lawyers to send two lines to a certain western
country; but then they start focussing on stuff like this :-(
--
greetz, marc
Xerox does it again
Hi all,
I will take care of them as they come up.
For those trying to unsubscribe, please go to
http://ozlabs.org/mailman/options/linuxppc-dev
and fill in your email address and click on unsubscribe. If you do not
get a confirmation email, then maybe you are subscribed with a different
email
* Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
It slipped through because it didnt get caught in build tests because
cpufreq isnt enabled in the powerpc defconfig.
Which is one of the reasons we have linux-next: integration testing.
Build bugs slipped through that net too in the past.
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 10:05 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 10:48 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Linus,
Today's linux-next build (powerpc ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
* Michael Ellerman mich...@ellerman.id.au wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 10:05 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 10:48 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Linus,
Today's linux-next build (powerpc
* Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
This updates the cpufreq drivers in arch/powerpc so they build again
after the core cpufreq changes that broke them in commit
in835481d9bcd65720b473db6b38746a74a3964218.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org
Hi,
Dave reports a 2.6.28 regression here:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253149
X (server v1.5.3) no longer starts, it aborts with a mmap() error.
This is because X tries to use sysfs pci legacy_mem to map the VGA frame
buffer if it is available, and this became available in 2.6.28
Hi Ingo,
While booting up 2.6.29-rc1 kernel on powerpc machine, Kernel
Badness warning is seen, when compiled with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y
[boot]0012 Setup Arch
PCI host bridge /p...@8002200 ranges:
IO 0x3dffe01f..0x3dffe01f - 0x000f
MEM
Hi All,
i have MPC8555 processor, also i have linux-kernel 2.6.19-rc5 on my board.i
want to use the DMA on my board, just a simple example is enough for me but
during my reading on how to use the DMA i have some questions:
1. The DMA buffer is always needed for all kind of buses or not? (I think
* Kamalesh Babulal kamal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Hi Ingo,
While booting up 2.6.29-rc1 kernel on powerpc machine, Kernel
Badness warning is seen, when compiled with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y
kernel warning is not seen after reverting the patch.
commit
unsubscribe
please
Ravishankar Govindarao
RFL Electronics Inc.
E-mail : ravi@rflelect.com
Voice: 973.334.3100 Ext. 233
Fax: 973.334.3863
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE
This e-mail, including any attachments, may contain confidential and/or
legally privileged information. The Information is intended
unsubscribe
please
From: linuxppc-dev-bounces+rajasekaran.k=hcl...@ozlabs.org
[mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+rajasekaran.k=hcl...@ozlabs.org] On Behalf
Of ravi@rflelect.com
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 6:26 PM
To: rsterl...@ssl.berkeley.edu
Cc:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 2:07 AM, florian.bel...@freenet.de wrote:
hello,
I have some problems with an mpc5200b based board. It's nearly compatible to
the lite5200b board.
I connected an samsung k9k8g08u0a nand flash via the lpb bus. This works
fine with an self written nand driver.
Now I
On Jan 12, 2009, at 1:55 AM, Li Yang wrote:
-Original Message-
From: linuxppc-dev-bounces+leoli=freescale@ozlabs.org
[mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+leoli=freescale@ozlabs.org]
On Behalf Of Anton Vorontsov
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 11:30 PM
To: Kumar Gala
Cc:
On Jan 10, 2009, at 1:50 PM, Adrian Reber wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:52:56AM -0600, Milton Miller wrote:
On Sun Jan 11 at 02:31:22 EST in 2009, Adrian Reber wrote:
This adds support for a simple character device to access the
flash for SLOF based systems like the PowerStation, QS2x
Acked by: Brian King brk...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Stephen Rothwell wrote:
This is a powerpc specific driver.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
---
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 14 +++---
drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.h |6 +++---
2 files changed, 10
Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 2:07 AM, florian.bel...@freenet.de wrote:
hello,
I have some problems with an mpc5200b based board. It's nearly compatible to
the lite5200b board.
I connected an samsung k9k8g08u0a nand flash via the lpb bus. This works
fine with an self written
On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 10:31 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 16:26 -0800, Carl Love wrote:
I pulled down the git tree, compiled and installed it. I tested it
against the OProfile testsuite, which includes SPU event profiling
tests. Everything passed. The patch
Adrian Reber wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 11:52:56AM -0600, Milton Miller wrote:
Normally such drivers are written and mtd drivers.
If slof were not an of implementation I would just say put the right
properties on the node in the device tree, but the kernel should adapt
to real OF. It
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Jan 12, 2009, at 1:55 AM, Li Yang wrote:
-Original Message-
Freescale BSP is for customer who needs the out-of-box experience. It's
better tested, but doesn't update very frequently. I would
On Monday 12 January 2009, Martyn Welch wrote:
Adrian Reber wrote:
The reason why I did not use mtd is that part of the flash is used by
the firmware image and I do not know if that works with mtd, if only a
part of the flash can be used. SLOF does also a CRC check over the
firmware
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:22:01AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
This updates the cpufreq drivers in arch/powerpc so they build again
after the core cpufreq changes that broke them in commit
in835481d9bcd65720b473db6b38746a74a3964218.
Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On 12.01.09 08:15:27, Carl Love wrote:
On Sun, 2009-01-11 at 10:31 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 16:26 -0800, Carl Love wrote:
I pulled down the git tree, compiled and installed it. I tested it
against the OProfile testsuite, which includes SPU event
On Sunday 11 January 2009, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 13:51 -0800, Ira Snyder wrote:
The guests (PowerPC computers running Linux) are PCI cards in the host
system (an Intel Pentium3-M system). The guest computers can access all
of the host's memory. The guests
On Monday 12 January 2009, Robert Richter wrote:
Arnd, I thought the patches were ok for you. If there are still some
concerns, we have to make delta patches.
Yes, that's fine with me, thanks for taking care of the patches!
Arnd
___
On Sunday 11 January 2009, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello.
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
CONFIG_LOPEC and CONFIG_SANDPOINT config options are gone.
So these are gone with arch/ppc/?
Yep.
That's a pity -- MV has spent a lot of efforts on porting the latter
to arch/powerpc/
On Sunday 11 January 2009, Gerhard Pircher wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:51:55 +0100
Von: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz bzoln...@gmail.com
An: Gerhard Pircher gerhard_pirc...@gmx.net
CC: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca,
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 18:59 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Monday 12 January 2009, Robert Richter wrote:
Arnd, I thought the patches were ok for you. If there are still some
concerns, we have to make delta patches.
Yes, that's fine with me, thanks for taking care of the patches!
This patch fixes following bug:
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! [S03mountvirtfs-:922]
Modules linked in:
NIP: c006505c LR: c00675f0 CTR: c0020438
REGS: c7a1db90 TRAP: 0901 Not tainted (2.6.28-rc8-01311-g8c7396a)
MSR: 9032 EE,ME,IR,DR CR: 28248442 XER: 2000
TASK =
On Jan 12, 2009, at 11:20 AM, Leon Woestenberg wrote:
Hello,
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 4:07 PM, Kumar Gala
ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Jan 12, 2009, at 1:55 AM, Li Yang wrote:
-Original Message-
Freescale BSP is for customer who needs the out-of-box
experience. It's
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Yuri Tikhonov y...@emcraft.com wrote:
This patch adds support for 256KB pages on ppc44x-based boards.
Hi Yuri,
Do you still need the mm/shmem.c patch to avoid division by zero? I
looked at the mm/shmem.c latest git code, and I see that it doesn't
have the
Hi Wael,
1. The DMA engine source and destination registers are based on
physical memory addresses, whatever is the bus connected on, thus you
need to provide it physical addresses.
It looks like you are a bit confused about the terminology DMA
buffer: a DMA buffer is either the source and/or
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 14:37 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Roland Dreier wrote:
Can you double check that the e1000 isn't copying the PCI resources into
a unsigned long before ioremap'ing the result, thus cropping the top
bits ?
as far as I can see, e1000 is
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 11:29 +, Daniel Drake wrote:
Hi,
Dave reports a 2.6.28 regression here:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=253149
X (server v1.5.3) no longer starts, it aborts with a mmap() error.
This is because X tries to use sysfs pci legacy_mem to map the VGA frame
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 09:34 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
This updates the cpufreq drivers in arch/powerpc so they build again
after the core cpufreq changes that broke them in commit
in835481d9bcd65720b473db6b38746a74a3964218.
Hello Prodyut,
On Monday, January 12, 2009 you wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:42 AM, Yuri Tikhonov y...@emcraft.com wrote:
This patch adds support for 256KB pages on ppc44x-based boards.
Hi Yuri,
Do you still need the mm/shmem.c patch to avoid division by zero?
Yes.
I looked at
This patch adds support for 256KB pages on ppc44x-based boards.
For simplification of implementation with 256KB pages we still assume
2-level paging. As a side effect this leads to wasting extra memory space
reserved for PTE tables: only 1/4 of pages allocated for PTEs are
actually used. But this
Milton Miller wrote:
I request the following patches in patchwork be considered for 2.6.29:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/3778/
powerpc ps3: use smp_request_message_ipi
I tested this on PS3, and it seems to work OK.
Acked-by: Geoff Levand geoffrey.lev...@am.sony.com
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:08:07 +1100
Von: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org
An: Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com
CC: Gerhard Pircher gerhard_pirc...@gmx.net, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Betreff: Re: [PATCH 1/5] powerpc: Add platform support
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:12:18 +1100
Von: Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org
An: Gerhard Pircher gerhard_pirc...@gmx.net
CC: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
Betreff: Re: [PATCH 2/5] powerpc: Generic device
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:55:55 +0100
Von: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz bzoln...@gmail.com
An: Gerhard Pircher gerhard_pirc...@gmx.net
CC: linux-...@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org,
grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
Betreff: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ide: Force
Hello,
This is the next attempt on asynchronous RAID-6 support. This patch-set
has the Dan Williams' comments (Dec, 17) addressed with the following
exception:
- I still think that using 'enum dma_ctrl_flags' for PQ-specific
operations is better than introducing another group of flags and
This adds support for doing asynchronous GF multiplication by adding
four additional functions to async_tx API:
async_pq() does simultaneous XOR of sources and XOR of sources
GF-multiplied by given coefficients.
async_pq_zero_sum() checks if results of calculations match given
ones.
This patch extends async_tx API with two operations for recovery
operations on RAID6 array with two failed disks using new async_pq()
operation. Patch introduces the following functions:
async_r6_dd_recov() recovers after double data disk failure
async_r6_dp_recov() recovers after D+P failure
The raid_run_ops routine uses the asynchronous offload api and
the stripe_operations member of a stripe_head to carry out xor+pqxor+copy
operations asynchronously, outside the lock.
The operations performed by RAID-6 are the same as in the RAID-5 case
except for no support of STRIPE_OP_PREXOR
This patch introduces the state machine for handling the RAID-6 parities
check and repair functionality.
Signed-off-by: Yuri Tikhonov y...@emcraft.com
Signed-off-by: Ilya Yanok ya...@emcraft.com
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 164 +++-
1 files changed,
2009-01-13
03212009
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 03:43:55AM +0300, Yuri Tikhonov wrote:
Adds the platform device definitions and the architecture specific support
routines for the ppc440spe adma driver.
Any board equipped with PPC440SP(e) controller may utilize this driver.
diff --git
To increase the amount of code that's built for a defconfig build.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman mich...@ellerman.id.au
---
arch/powerpc/configs/ppc64_defconfig | 26 +-
1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Friday 09 January 2009 08:21:27 Ira Snyder wrote:
Rusty, since you wrote the virtio code, can you point me at the things I
would need to implement to use virtio over the PCI bus.
The guests (PowerPC computers running Linux) are PCI cards in the host
system (an Intel Pentium3-M system).
On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 01:51 +0300, Yuri Tikhonov wrote:
On Tuesday, January 13, 2009 you wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 14:37 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Roland Dreier wrote:
Can you double check that the e1000 isn't copying the PCI resources
into
a
I think I throw away the IDE controller node for now, as libata just reads
the PCI register settings (progif) and I guess the IDE subsystem will do
the same in the future.
Well... if all AmigaOne use a 8259, they probably use the same interrupt
routing except for PCI slots. In which case, I
Yes, it can wait.
Although I would like to know from the powerpc maintainer, if my platform
patches could still go in 2.6.29, if I resend them in the next days? I guess
it's
too late, right?
Yes it is. I'll put them in -next after -rc2 or later, when we are happy
with them. That gives us a
--
-_-
.
Regards,
R.S.Shree Ram
GDA Technologies Ltd.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Jan 12, 2009, at 1:55 AM, Li Yang wrote:
-Original Message-
From: linuxppc-dev-bounces+leoli=freescale@ozlabs.org
[mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+leoli=freescale@ozlabs.org]
On Behalf Of Anton
From: Anton Vorontsov avoront...@ru.mvista.com
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:38:35 +0300
This patch fixes following bug:
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 61s! [S03mountvirtfs-:922]
...
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov avoront...@ru.mvista.com
Applied, thanks Anton.
--
Naresh Bhat
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
--
Dipl.-Ing. Joachim Bader
Research Technology
Cockpit and Display Systems
Diehl Aerospace GmbH
An der Sandelmuehle 13
D-60439 Frankfurt
Phone +49-69-5805-1270
Fax +49-69-5805-1400
e-mail: joachim.ba...@diehl-aerospace.de
http://www.diehl-aerospace.de
61 matches
Mail list logo
