Add support for:
- LXT phy
- AT24 eeprom
- RTC (DS1337)
- MTD partitioning based on OF description
Signed-off-by: Grzegorz Bernacki g...@semihalf.com
---
arch/powerpc/configs/mpc5200_defconfig | 72
1 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff
* Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
Paul,
I found the bug that was causing large modules to fail in setting
up dynamic ftrace. It wound up being a simple math error. To calculate
the offset in the TOC, I had used an OR, but the bottom half was
a signed extended short, and it
On Sun, 8 Feb 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday 08 February 2009, Paul Collins wrote:
Paul Collins p...@burly.ondioline.org writes:
Rafael J. Wysocki r...@sisk.pl writes:
On Wednesday 21 January 2009, Paul Collins wrote:
Got a couple of these on a PowerBook running
On Feb 9, 2009, at 1:47 AM, Li Yang wrote:
It's a complex case for RDB boards. The revision A and revision B
boards DO always connect TSEC0 to Vitesse switch. While the latest
revision C board has one setting to connect TSEC0 to a Marvell PHY and
MDIO bus. In BSP we have several DTS's for
I have just tried the patch here and everything worked great!
Very well done.
On Mon, Feb 9, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu wrote:
* Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
Paul,
I found the bug that was causing large modules to fail in setting
up dynamic ftrace. It wound
Steven Rostedt wrote:
I found the bug that was causing large modules to fail in setting
up dynamic ftrace. It wound up being a simple math error. To calculate
the offset in the TOC, I had used an OR, but the bottom half was
a signed extended short, and it should have been an addition.
The fix
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 11:49:47AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:40:41 -0800
Grant Erickson gerick...@nuovations.com wrote:
On 1/30/09 2:05 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:54:42 -0700 dougthomp...@xmission.com wrote:
From: Grant Erickson
On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:01:19 -0500
Josh Boyer jwbo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 11:49:47AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:40:41 -0800
Grant Erickson gerick...@nuovations.com wrote:
On 1/30/09 2:05 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009
On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 10:40 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org wrote:
Paul,
I found the bug that was causing large modules to fail in setting
up dynamic ftrace. It wound up being a simple math error. To calculate
the offset in the TOC, I had used an OR,
On Monday 09 February 2009, Michael Neuling wrote:
arch/powerpc/oprofile/cell/spu_profiler.c is missing a asm/time.h
include which is required for ppc_proc_freq. This can cause compile
failures for some config combinations.
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling mi...@neuling.org
Acked-by: Arnd
cbe_cpufreq.c uses cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi which is provided by
cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c. Hence CBE_CPUFREQ depends on CBE_CPUFREQ_PMI.
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling mi...@neuling.org
---
I'm not 100% sure is this the right fix. Should CBE_CPUFREQ really
depend on CBE_CPUFREQ_PMI?
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 11:46 +1100, Michael Neuling wrote:
cbe_cpufreq.c uses cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi which is provided by
cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c. Hence CBE_CPUFREQ depends on CBE_CPUFREQ_PMI.
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling mi...@neuling.org
---
I'm not 100% sure is this the right fix. Should
The EEH code disables and enables interrupts during the
device recovery process. This is unnecessary for MSI
and MSI-X interrupts because they are effectively disabled
by the DMA Stopped state when an EEH error occurs. The
current code is also incorrect for MSI-X interrupts. It
doesn't take
cbe_cpufreq.c uses cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi which is provided by
cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c. Hence CBE_CPUFREQ depends on CBE_CPUFREQ_PMI.
=20
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling mi...@neuling.org
---
I'm not 100% sure is this the right fix. Should CBE_CPUFREQ really
depend on CBE_CPUFREQ_PMI?
Fixed v_mapped_by_tlbcam() and p_mapped_by_tlbcam() to use phys_addr_t
instead of unsigned long. In 36-bit physical mode we really need these
functions to deal with phys_addr_t when trying to match a physical
address or when returning one.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
Please pull from 'merge' branch of
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/galak/powerpc.git merge
to receive the following updates:
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8313erdb.dts | 11 ---
arch/powerpc/configs/83xx/mpc8313_rdb_defconfig |2 +-
The PCI IO region sizes where incorrectly set to 1M instead of 64k.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8572ds.dts| 10 +-
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8572ds_camp_core0.dts |8
Added a device tree that should be identical to mpc8572ds.dtb except
the physical addresses for all IO are above the 4G boundary.
Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala ga...@kernel.crashing.org
---
arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8572ds_36b.dts | 787 +++
1 files changed, 787
cbe_cpufreq.c uses cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi which is provided by
cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c. Hence CBE_CPUFREQ depends on CBE_CPUFREQ_PMI.
=20
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling mi...@neuling.org
---
I'm not 100% sure is this the right fix. Should CBE_CPUFREQ really
depend on CBE_CPUFREQ_PMI?
No I
Hi Linus !
A few powerpc bits for you for 2.6.29. A few bug and regression fixes
(after this pull, it will be regressions only), a couple of board
device tree updates and some trivialities such as build breakage with
random config options due to missing includes.
Among others, this should solve
Hi,
When I make zImage, the errors below came out. Any tips?
[linux-2.6-virtex]$ make zImage
CHK include/linux/version.h
CHK include/linux/utsrelease.h
CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
CHK include/linux/compile.h
dnsdomainname: Unknown host
CC
We currently place mmaps just below the stack on 32bit, but leave them
in the middle of the address space on 64bit:
0010-0012 r-xp 0010 00:00 0[vdso]
1000-1001 r-xp 08:06 179534 /tmp/sleep
1001-1002 rw-p 08:06 179534
cbe_cpufreq.c uses cbe_cpufreq_has_pmi which is provided by
cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c. Hence CBE_CPUFREQ depends on CBE_CPUFREQ_PMI.
=20
Signed-off-by: Michael Neuling mi...@neuling.org
---
I'm not 100% sure is this the right fix. Should CBE_CPUFREQ really
depend on CBE_CPUFREQ_PMI?
23 matches
Mail list logo