* Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Sat, 2009-02-14 at 23:03 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
So the question is: even with FRAME_POINTERS disabled on PPC, is
__builtin_return_address(1)/(2) reliable, and is save_stack_trace() fast?
(i.e.
can it walk down the stack
Josh Boyer-4 wrote:
Hi All,
I've been rather busy lately and have unfortunately gotten behind on
updating the 4xx tree. I spent some time this weekend looking over
the patches queued up, and fortunately there were not too many. I'm
doing some build testing of these 4 today:
commit
Hi
I've noticed that in 2.6.29-rc5 Serial Rapid IO is only available
for 86xx processors. There's also no Freescale BSP for 8548.
What is the best source of SRIO driver for this CPU ? Can I
simply enable SRIO support in mainline kernel for 85xx and hope
it will work ?
Thanks.
Felix.
--
View
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 05:31:40AM -0800, Felix Radensky wrote:
What about 4xx SPI driver ? Is it planned for inclusion in 2.6.30 ?
I really hope so. I've Acked it twice now I think. However, that needs
to go in through the SPI tree, which isn't mine.
josh
static void cpm2_cascade(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
{
int cascade_irq;
while ((cascade_irq = cpm2_get_irq()) = 0)
generic_handle_irq(cascade_irq);
desc-chip-eoi(irq);
}
You can try doing an early EOI see that helps. Ie, stick it inside the
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:04:20 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
static void cpm2_cascade(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
{
int cascade_irq;
while ((cascade_irq = cpm2_get_irq()) = 0)
generic_handle_irq(cascade_irq);
On Friday 06 February 2009 10:03:55 Klaus Pedersen wrote:
Hi David
I'm also run on a custom board, and using the MBX.
You need to get the device tree file right. You will see the MBX reserved
the irq 66 in the boot printout.
Instead of using insmod use modprobe. The are 2 versions of
