Hi Ben,
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:29:13 +1000 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_970_NAP)+= idle_power4.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_OF) += of_device.o of_platform.o prom_parse.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_CLOCK) += clock.o
-procfs-$(CONFIG_PPC64)
* Arjan van de Ven ar...@infradead.org [2009-09-24 14:22:28]:
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:42:41 +0530
Arun R Bharadwaj a...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
* Arun R Bharadwaj a...@linux.vnet.ibm.com [2009-09-22 16:55:27]:
Hi Len, (or other acpi folks),
I had a question regarding ACPI-cpuidle
Tejun Heo wrote:
Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
--- Exception: 301 at .memset+0x60/0xfc
LR = .pcpu_alloc+0x718/0x8fc
So it's memsetting something that causes it to hash_page(), ie, faulting
in pages (vmalloc space ?) so far nothing obviously wrong
It's probably memset()
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 5:52 PM, Arjan van de Ven ar...@infradead.org wrote:
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:42:41 +0530
Arun R Bharadwaj a...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
* Arun R Bharadwaj a...@linux.vnet.ibm.com [2009-09-22 16:55:27]:
Hi Len, (or other acpi folks),
I had a question regarding
* Arjan van de Ven ar...@infradead.org [2009-09-24 13:41:23]:
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:33:07 +0200
Peter Zijlstra a.p.zijls...@chello.nl wrote:
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 18:38 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 09:51 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
I don't quite
Hello,
Sachin Sant wrote:
4PERCPU: chunk 1 relocating -1 - 18 c000db70fb00
c000db70fb00:c000db70fb00
4PERCPU: relocated c1120320:c1120320
4PERCPU: chunk 1 relocating 18 - 16 c000db70fb00
c1120320:c1120320
4PERCPU: relocated
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:55:49 +0530
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan sva...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
I obviously can't speak for p-series cpus, just wanted to point out
that there is no universal truth about offlining saves power.
Hi Arjan,
As you have said, on some cpus the extra effort of
Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
Sachin Sant wrote:
4PERCPU: chunk 1 relocating -1 - 18 c000db70fb00
c000db70fb00:c000db70fb00
4PERCPU: relocated c1120320:c1120320
4PERCPU: chunk 1 relocating 18 - 16 c000db70fb00
c1120320:c1120320
4PERCPU: relocated
Tejun Heo wrote:
Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
Sachin Sant wrote:
4PERCPU: chunk 1 relocating -1 - 18 c000db70fb00
c000db70fb00:c000db70fb00
4PERCPU: relocated c1120320:c1120320
4PERCPU: chunk 1 relocating 18 - 16 c000db70fb00
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 16:39 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
Hello,
Sachin Sant wrote:
4PERCPU: chunk 1 relocating -1 - 18 c000db70fb00
c000db70fb00:c000db70fb00
4PERCPU: relocated c1120320:c1120320
4PERCPU: chunk 1 relocating 18 - 16 c000db70fb00
I think there's more finishyness to 8xx than we thought. IE. That
tlbil_va might have more reasons to be there than what the comment
seems to advertize. Can you try to move it even higher up ? IE.
Unconditionally at the beginning of set_pte_filter ?
Also, if that doesn't help, can
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 12:36 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
* Arjan van de Ven ar...@infradead.org [2009-09-24 14:22:28]:
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:42:41 +0530
Arun R Bharadwaj a...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
* Arun R Bharadwaj a...@linux.vnet.ibm.com [2009-09-22 16:55:27]:
Sachin Sant wrote:
With this patch applied the machine boots OK :-)
Ah... so, the problem really is too high address. If you've got some
time, it might be interesting to find out how far high is safe.
Thanks.
--
tejun
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:54:24 +0200
Peter Zijlstra a.p.zijls...@chello.nl wrote:
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 12:36 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote:
* Arjan van de Ven ar...@infradead.org [2009-09-24 14:22:28]:
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 10:42:41 +0530
Arun R Bharadwaj a...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
On 09/25/2009 08:39 AM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 11:12:21AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 15:28 +0400, Yuri Frolov wrote:
Hello,
here is a corresponding bug:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11143
This patch should correctly export
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 10:31 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
The main problem with 8xx it does not update the DAR register in
the TLB Miss/Fault handlers for cache instructions :( It on old bug
that was found only some years ago.
I think the old comment is correct though, as I recall it was
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 18:01 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
With this patch applied the machine boots OK :-)
Ah... so, the problem really is too high address. If you've got some
time, it might be interesting to find out how far high is safe.
Might give me a clue about what the problem is but I
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
The driver always ends a read with a STOP condition which
breaks subsequent I2C reads/writes in the same transaction as
these expect to do a repeated START(ReSTART).
This will also help I2C multimaster as the bus will not be released
after the first read, but when
Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote on 25/09/2009 11:47:34:
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 10:31 +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
The main problem with 8xx it does not update the DAR register in
the TLB Miss/Fault handlers for cache instructions :( It on old bug
that was found
I was trying to insert an optimized strlen() function using the
following code taken from the ibm site on an MPC5121, but it crashes the
kernel.
Is it because it's an unsupported op, or because I'm missing some needed
steps?
Thank you,
Matteo
_GLOBAL(strlen)
addi r4,0,8// Load byte
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Asier Llano Palacios
asierll...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
We've been working with a lite5200b for a while, we have been working
with the ppc platform in linux 2.6.x for 5 years and it worked properly
until 2.6.25 included. We want to switch to the powerpc
Hi Stephen,
next-20090925 randconfig build breaks on hvcs driver on powerpc,
with HVC_CONSOLE=n.
ERROR: .hvc_put_chars [drivers/char/hvcs.ko] undefined!
ERROR: .hvc_get_chars [drivers/char/hvcs.ko] undefined!
adding the dependency of HVC_CONSOLE helped
Signed-off-by: Kamalesh Babulal
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 10:51 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 14:11 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
I still think its a layering violation... its the hypervisor manager
that should be bothered in what state an off-lined cpu is in.
That's not how our hypervisor
On Sep 25, 2009, at 4:07 AM, Fortini Matteo wrote:
I was trying to insert an optimized strlen() function using the
following code taken from the ibm site on an MPC5121, but it crashes
the kernel.
Is it because it's an unsupported op, or because I'm missing some
needed steps?
Thank you,
* Arun R Bharadwaj a...@linux.vnet.ibm.com [2009-09-22 16:55:27]:
Hi,
I have done the following experiments and have posted the results
below.
Average of 5 iterations:
--
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 03:28:11PM +0400, Yuri Frolov wrote:
Hello,
here is a corresponding bug: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11143
This patch should correctly export crtsavres.o in order to make O= option
working.
Please, consider to apply.
Hi Yuri.
I like the way you do
Ben/all,
I have had some luck reserving some memory (via in this autoscan
(which reserves the resources)) which in this hack code - I reserve
an appropriate amount of resources for the bridge (by detecting
this special type of port).
The problem comes later on - when the Hotplug event comes -
Anybody else getting these? They just started popping up with the
recent changes for 2.6.32.
ppc_4xxFP-ld: .tmp_vmlinux1: warning: allocated section `.data_nosave'
not in segment KSYM.tmp_kallsyms1.S
AS .tmp_kallsyms1.o
LD .tmp_vmlinux2
ppc_4xxFP-ld: .tmp_vmlinux2: warning:
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 16:48 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2009-09-24 at 10:51 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-15 at 14:11 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
I still think its a layering violation... its the hypervisor manager
that should be bothered in what state an
Thus spake Benjamin Herrenschmidt (b...@kernel.crashing.org):
I think there's more finishyness to 8xx than we thought. IE. That
tlbil_va might have more reasons to be there than what the comment
seems to advertize. Can you try to move it even higher up ? IE.
Unconditionally at the
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 21:45 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 03:28:11PM +0400, Yuri Frolov wrote:
Hello,
here is a corresponding bug:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11143
This patch should correctly export crtsavres.o in order to make O= option
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 07:57:32AM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2009-09-25 at 21:45 +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 03:28:11PM +0400, Yuri Frolov wrote:
Hello,
here is a corresponding bug:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11143
This
32 matches
Mail list logo
