Hi all,
Yesterday's (and today's) linux-next boot (PowerPC) failed like this:
[ cut here ]
Badness at kernel/lockdep.c:2301
NIP: c00a35c8 LR: c00084c4 CTR:
REGS: c0bf77e0 TRAP: 0700 Not tainted (2.6.34-rc4-autokern1)
MSR:
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 16:12 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Caused by commit bd6d29c25bb1a24a4c160ec5de43e0004e01f72b (lockstat:
Make lockstat counting per cpu). This added a WARN_ON_ONCE to
debug_atomic_inc() which is called from trace_hardirqs_on_caller()
with
irqs enabled.
Line 2301
From: Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:49:40 +0200
Btw., WARN_ON trapping on PowerPC is clearly a PowerPC bug - there's a good
reason we have WARN_ON versus BUG_ON - it should be fixed.
I disagree, an implementation should be allowed to use the most
efficient implementation
Hallo Bill,
On Thursday 15 April 2010 05:07:08 Bill Gatliff wrote:
Actually, I *have* Debian squeeze's xorg running on the platform just
fine, with a 2.6.34-rc1 kernel (kernel.org). Problem is, every single
diagonal line is very blocky--- not smooth at all.
I'm 95% sure it's an endianess
* David Miller da...@davemloft.net wrote:
From: Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:49:40 +0200
Btw., WARN_ON trapping on PowerPC is clearly a PowerPC bug - there's a good
reason we have WARN_ON versus BUG_ON - it should be fixed.
I disagree, an implementation should
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 22:07:08 -0500
Bill Gatliff b...@billgatliff.com wrote:
Put simply, I have an MPC5200b platform with a Fujitsu Lime GDC, and
I'm trying to run Debian squeeze's xorg on it.
Actually, I *have* Debian squeeze's xorg running on the platform just
fine, with a 2.6.34-rc1
* Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi all,
Yesterday's (and today's) linux-next boot (PowerPC) failed like this:
[ cut here ]
Badness at kernel/lockdep.c:2301
NIP: c00a35c8 LR: c00084c4 CTR:
REGS: c0bf77e0
Hi Ingo,
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:49:40 +0200 Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu wrote:
Ok, we'll fix the warning.
Thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
pgpGux6Rr8FG8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hi Ben,
On Thursday 15 April 2010 00:25:23 Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
It should be possible to get that working, but I suspect not without
some code changes. I know the current PCIe hotswap driver has ACPI hooks
that would need to be replaced by appropriate hooks into the powerpc
code to
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 08:49:40AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi all,
Yesterday's (and today's) linux-next boot (PowerPC) failed like this:
[ cut here ]
Badness at kernel/lockdep.c:2301
NIP:
Roman Fietze wrote:
Hallo Bill,
On Thursday 15 April 2010 05:07:08 Bill Gatliff wrote:
Actually, I *have* Debian squeeze's xorg running on the platform just
fine, with a 2.6.34-rc1 kernel (kernel.org). Problem is, every single
diagonal line is very blocky--- not smooth at all.
Hello Bill,
On Thursday 15 April 2010 15:01:59 Bill Gatliff wrote:
Are you talking about this code here?
void
shadowUpdatePacked (ScreenPtr pScreen,
shadowBufPtr pBuf)
{
...
while (i--)
*win++ = *sha++;
* Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 08:49:40AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi all,
Yesterday's (and today's) linux-next boot (PowerPC) failed like this:
[ cut here
Ian Munsie wrote:
From: Ian Munsie imun...@au.ibm.com
The perf userspace tool included some architecture specific code to map
registers from the DWARF register number into the names used by the regs
and stack access API.
This patch moves the architecture specific code out into a separate
Ian Munsie wrote:
From: Ian Munsie imun...@au.ibm.com
This patch adds mappings from the register numbers from DWARF to the
register names used in the PowerPC Regs and Stack Access API. This
allows perf probe to be used to record variable contents on PowerPC.
This patch depends on
I would love it if you posted your code! Thanks!!
b.g.
On Apr 15, 2010 8:53 AM, Roman Fietze roman.fie...@telemotive.de wrote:
Hello Bill,
On Thursday 15 April 2010 15:01:59 Bill Gatliff wrote:
Are you talking about this code here?
...
Yes. I added a routine like
/* Swap frame buffer
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 04:03:58PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
In this case, I guess the following fix should be sufficient?
I'm going to test it and provide a sane changelog.
diff --git a/kernel/lockdep.c b/kernel/lockdep.c
index 78325f8..65d4336 100644
--- a/kernel/lockdep.c
+++
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 04:03:58PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
diff --git a/kernel/lockdep.c b/kernel/lockdep.c
index 78325f8..65d4336 100644
--- a/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -2298,7 +2298,11 @@ void trace_hardirqs_on_caller(unsigned long ip)
return;
* Frederic Weisbecker fweis...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 04:03:58PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
diff --git a/kernel/lockdep.c b/kernel/lockdep.c
index 78325f8..65d4336 100644
--- a/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -2298,7 +2298,11 @@ void
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:38:02AM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
This is started as swsusp_32.S modifications, but the amount of #ifdefs
made the whole file horribly unreadable, so let's put the support into
its own separate file.
The code should be relatively easy to modify to support 44x
On Apr 15, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 12:38:02AM +0300, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
This is started as swsusp_32.S modifications, but the amount of #ifdefs
made the whole file horribly unreadable, so let's put the support into
its own separate file.
The
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 02:20:23PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
[...]
Kumar,
According to patchwork, this is now delegated to you. Do you
have any objections to merge this?
Would like Scott's Ack.
Cc'ing.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Kumar,
According to patchwork, this is now delegated to you. Do you
have any objections to merge this?
Would like Scott's Ack.
I think we need to save IACn, DACn, DBCRn, PID0, and USPRG0.
Might want to also save TLB1
Roman Fietze wrote:
Then I added void shadowUpdatePackedSwapped16() and
shadowUpdatePackedSwapped32() which I was using instead of the
original *Weak functions, which in turn uses the above swap routine
when copying from shadow to the device.
I'm not sure what the *Weak stuff is doing.
Scott Wood wrote:
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Kumar,
According to patchwork, this is now delegated to you. Do you
have any objections to merge this?
Would like Scott's Ack.
I think we need to save IACn, DACn, DBCRn, PID0, and USPRG0.
Might want
This patch adds support for eTSEC 2.0 as found in P1020.
The changes include introduction of the group nodes for
the etsec nodes.
Signed-off-by: Sandeep Gopalpet sandeep.ku...@freescale.com
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov avoront...@mvista.com
---
This is based on
Refresh ps3_defconfig to latest kernel sources and change
these kernel config options:
o CONFIG_USB_ANNOUNCE_NEW_DEVICES: n - y
o CONFIG_USB_EHCI_TT_NEWSCHED: n - y
o CONFIG_CMDLINE_BOOL: n - y
o CONFIG_CMDLINE: n -
Signed-off-by: Geoff Levand ge...@infradead.org
---
Update the PS3 entries in the MAINTAINERS file.
Signed-off-by: Geoff Levand ge...@infradead.org
---
MAINTAINERS |8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -4482,17 +4482,17 @@ S: Maintained
F: drivers/ata/sata_promise.*
What is the recommended git repository for active MPC5121 development?
I pulled the tag DENX-v2.6.33.1 from git.denx.de, and, unless I'm
overlooking something, it seems to be lacking some driver support such
as NAND, RTC, etc. I also notice an older head called
mpc512x-v2.6.33-devel. Should I be
to enable the storage controller on earlier rev. mpc834x itx boards.
Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips kim.phill...@freescale.com
---
arch/powerpc/configs/mpc83xx_defconfig |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/configs/mpc83xx_defconfig
On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 09:32 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
It trades robustness for slightly better space/code efficiency.
Such a trap based mechanism exists on x86 as well and we use it for BUG_ON().
We intentionally dont use it to generate warnings and dont override __WARN(),
because it would
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 23:55 -0700, David Miller wrote:
From: Ingo Molnar mi...@elte.hu
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:49:40 +0200
Btw., WARN_ON trapping on PowerPC is clearly a PowerPC bug - there's a good
reason we have WARN_ON versus BUG_ON - it should be fixed.
I disagree, an
Roman Fietze wrote:
Yes. I added a routine like
/* Swap frame buffer bytes in 32 bit value. */
static __inline unsigned int
fbbits_swap32(unsigned int __bsx)
{
return __bsx) 0xff00) 8) | (((__bsx) 0x00ff) 8) |
(((__bsx) 0xff00) 8) | (((__bsx)
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 03:05:08PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote:
Kumar Gala wrote:
On Apr 15, 2010, at 1:45 PM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Kumar,
According to patchwork, this is now delegated to you. Do you
have any objections to merge this?
Would like Scott's Ack.
I think we need to save
34 matches
Mail list logo
