Hi Ben,
On Sat, 15 Dec 2012 07:44:57 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
...
Overall it's pretty quiet, or rather I've been pretty poor at
picking things up from patchwork and reviewing them this time
around and Kumar no better on the FSL side it seems...
Could you
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 09:30 +0100, Anatolij Gustschin wrote:
Overall it's pretty quiet, or rather I've been pretty poor at
picking things up from patchwork and reviewing them this time
around and Kumar no better on the FSL side it seems...
Could you please also include some 5xxx patches
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 21:06:25 +1100
Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
...
Last week is a bit late :-) However, I think your tree was in -next
before that wasn't it ? In which case it's ok, I can include it tomorrow
and ask Linus to pick it up.
yes, 5xxx tree was in -next
Hi Jimi,
I know this is a little late, but shouldn't these power7 specific
thingies be in obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64). The reason I ask is
that my compiler pukes on dcbtst and as I deal with that I wanted
to point this out.
I guess we could do that. It's a bit strange your assembler is
CTS-1000 is based on P4080. GPIO 27 is used to signal the FPGA to
switch off power, and also associates IRQ 8 with front-panel button
press (which we use to call orderly_poweroff()).
The relevant device-tree looks like this:
gpio0: gpio@13 {
compatible =
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:34:15 +1100
Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi all,
On Mon, 17 Dec 2012 14:22:38 +1100 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au
wrote:
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc allnoconfig)
produced this warning:
warning:
The purpose of this option is to allow ARM/etc systems that rely on the
class RTC subsystem to have the same kind of automatic NTP based
synchronization that we have on PC platforms. Today ARM does not
implement update_persistent_clock and makes extensive use of the class
RTC system.
When enabled
On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 07:44 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
Hi Linus !
Finally managed to get my head away from some other distractions
to put this pull request together, sorry for the lateness :-)
The main highlight is probably some base POWER8 support. There's
more to come such as
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 22:33 +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote:
Hi Jimi,
I know this is a little late, but shouldn't these power7 specific
thingies be in obj-$(CONFIG_PPC_BOOK3S_64). The reason I ask is
that my compiler pukes on dcbtst and as I deal with that I wanted
to point this out.
I
