On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 12:18:24 +, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 03:26:57PM +0800, Xiaomeng Tong wrote:
> > On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 04:58:23 +, David Laight wrote:
> > > on 3 Mar 2022 10:27:29 +0800, Xiaomeng Tong wrote:
> > > > The problem is the mis-use of iterator outside the
Since the IBM A2 CPU support was removed, see commit
fb5a515704d7 ("powerpc: Remove platforms/wsp and associated pieces"),
the only 64-bit Book3E CPUs we support are Freescale (NXP) ones.
However our Kconfig still allows configurating a kernel that has 64-bit
Book3E support, but no Freescale CPU
From: Minghao Chi (CGEL ZTE)
Use of_device_get_match_data() to simplify the code.
Reported-by: Zeal Robot
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi (CGEL ZTE)
---
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_msi.c | 6 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_msi.c
Inspired by (bd75b4ef4977: Constify static attribute_group structs),
accepted by linux-next, reported:
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/20220210202805.7750-4-rikard.falkeb...@gmail.com/
Nearly all singletons of type struct attribute_group are never
modified, and so
are
On Thu, 3 Mar 2022, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 05:25:10PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Thinking more about it we actually need to drop the xen_initial_domain()
> > check otherwise some cases won't be functional (Dom0 not 1:1 mapped, or
> > DomU 1:1 mapped).
>
>
remove unnecessary castings, from "void *" to "struct kvmppc_xics *"
Signed-off-by: Nour-eddine Taleb
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xics.c| 2 +-
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive.c| 2 +-
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_xive_native.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
On 3/3/22 5:57 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 08:15:03AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
Not for me, I fail to boot with
[ 52.202000] bnxt_en :31:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 256 bytes),
total 0 (slots), used 0 (slots)
(this is iscsi root so I need the NIC).
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215652
--- Comment #7 from Erhard F. (erhar...@mailbox.org) ---
(In reply to Alex Deucher from comment #6)
> You need to make sure the firmware is in your initrd. When the kernel
> loads, it loads from the initrd. There is no filesystem mounted yet
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215652
--- Comment #6 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Erhard F. from comment #5)
>
> With CONFIG_DRM_RADEON=m radeon does not load and I still get "modprobe:
> ERROR: could not insert 'radeon': Unknown symbol in module, or
Le 03/03/2022 à 17:59, Naveen N. Rao a écrit :
> Christophe Leroy wrote:
>> ftrace_caller() and frace_regs_caller() have now a lot in common.
>>
>> Refactor them using GAS macros.
>
> Thanks for doing this - this looks much better.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy
>> ---
>>
Christophe Leroy wrote:
ftrace_caller() and frace_regs_caller() have now a lot in common.
Refactor them using GAS macros.
Thanks for doing this - this looks much better.
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/trace/ftrace_mprofile.S | 147 ++--
1 file
On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 12:53:05PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Use the generic swiotlb initialization helper instead of open coding it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
> ---
> arch/mips/cavium-octeon/dma-octeon.c | 15 ++-
> arch/mips/pci/pci-octeon.c | 2 +-
>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215652
--- Comment #5 from Erhard F. (erhar...@mailbox.org) ---
Ok, changed my config to include the firmware via
CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMWARE="radeon/R520_cp.bin"
CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMWARE_DIR="/lib/firmware"
With CONFIG_DRM_RADEON=y the machine boots now as
This portion of the device tree just looks weird to me.
We have a standard way of doing I2C-over-GPIO and it is
a separate device tree node outside of the SoC node, not
inside the GPIO node.
Cc: Emmanuel Gil Peyrot
Cc: Jonathan Neuschäfer
Cc: Albert Herranz
Cc: Michael Ellerman
Cc: Alexandre
Hi Anshuman,
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 04:17:28PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> +static inline pgprot_t __vm_get_page_prot(unsigned long vm_flags)
> +{
> + switch (vm_flags & (VM_READ | VM_WRITE | VM_EXEC | VM_SHARED)) {
> + case VM_NONE:
> + return PAGE_NONE;
> + case
Christophe Leroy writes:
> Le 10/01/2022 à 11:07, Naveen N. Rao a écrit :
>> kernel test robot reported the below build error with a randconfig:
>>powerpc64-linux-ld: arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.o:(.toc+0x0):
>>undefined reference to `powerpc_security_features'
>>
>> This can happen
> From: Xiaomeng Tong
> > Sent: 03 March 2022 07:27
> >
> > On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 04:58:23 +, David Laight wrote:
> > > on 3 Mar 2022 10:27:29 +0800, Xiaomeng Tong wrote:
> > > > The problem is the mis-use of iterator outside the loop on exit, and
> > > > the iterator will be the HEAD's
On Thu, Mar 03, 2022 at 03:26:57PM +0800, Xiaomeng Tong wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 04:58:23 +, David Laight wrote:
> > on 3 Mar 2022 10:27:29 +0800, Xiaomeng Tong wrote:
> > > The problem is the mis-use of iterator outside the loop on exit, and
> > > the iterator will be the HEAD's
On 3/2/22 8:22 PM, Liam Howlett wrote:
* Abdul Haleem [220302 01:22]:
Greeting's
linux-next kernel 5.17.0-rc5-next-20220225 boot is broken on powerpc
Is this due to Introduction of maple patch series ?
It could be - those are certainly maple tree functions. I do have a
ppc64le VM booting
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 05:25:10PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Thinking more about it we actually need to drop the xen_initial_domain()
> check otherwise some cases won't be functional (Dom0 not 1:1 mapped, or
> DomU 1:1 mapped).
Hmm, but that would be the case even before this series,
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 10:29:31AM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> This won't help the current issue (because it doesn't exist and might
> never), but just in case some compiler people are listening, I'd like to
> have some sort of way to tell the compiler "treat this variable as
> uninitialized
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 08:15:03AM -0500, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> Not for me, I fail to boot with
>
> [ 52.202000] bnxt_en :31:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 256 bytes),
> total 0 (slots), used 0 (slots)
>
> (this is iscsi root so I need the NIC).
>
>
> I bisected it to "x86: remove the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215652
--- Comment #4 from Erhard F. (erhar...@mailbox.org) ---
No I don't use an initrd. The kernel to boot the Talos is on a boot partition,
modules are loaded from root partition. Which worked in 5.16 and before. Now I
am getting this "could not
From: Xiaomeng Tong
> Sent: 03 March 2022 07:27
>
> On Thu, 3 Mar 2022 04:58:23 +, David Laight wrote:
> > on 3 Mar 2022 10:27:29 +0800, Xiaomeng Tong wrote:
> > > The problem is the mis-use of iterator outside the loop on exit, and
> > > the iterator will be the HEAD's container_of pointer
On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 12:07:04PM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 10:29:31AM +0100, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> > This won't help the current issue (because it doesn't exist and might
> > never), but just in case some compiler people are listening, I'd like to
> > have some sort
correct for typo:
-for (struct list_head *list = head->next, cond = (struct list_head *)-1; cond
== (struct list_head *)-1; cond = NULL) \
+for (struct list_head *list = head->next, *cond = (struct list_head *)-1; cond
== (struct list_head *)-1; cond = NULL) \
--
Xiaomeng Tong
> I think this would make sense, it would mean you only assign the containing
> element on valid elements.
>
> I was thinking something along the lines of:
>
> #define list_for_each_entry(pos, head, member)
> \
> for (struct list_head *list =
27 matches
Mail list logo
