Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected

2007-12-04 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So 2.6.24-rc3 was OK and 2.6.24-rc3-git2 is not? Yes, the 2.6.24-rc3 was Ok and this is seen from 2.6.24-rc3-git2/3/4. just to make sure: this is a real lockup and failed bootup (or device init), not just a message, right? Ingo

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected

2007-12-04 Thread Kamalesh Babulal
Ingo Molnar wrote: * Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So 2.6.24-rc3 was OK and 2.6.24-rc3-git2 is not? Yes, the 2.6.24-rc3 was Ok and this is seen from 2.6.24-rc3-git2/3/4. just to make sure: this is a real lockup and failed bootup (or device init), not just a message, right?

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected

2007-12-04 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Ingo, This softlockup is seen in the 2.6.24-rc4 either and looks like a message because this is seen while running tbench and machine continues running other test's after the softlockup messages and some times seen with the bootup, but the

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected

2007-12-03 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:58:06 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:00:47 -0800 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:39:29 -0500 Kyle McMartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 12:35:33AM

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected

2007-11-29 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:01:08 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:47:19 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:59:00 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected

2007-11-29 Thread Kamalesh Babulal
Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:01:08 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:47:19 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:59:00 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected

2007-11-29 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 12:35:33AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: ten million is close enough to infinity for me to assume that we broke the driver and that's never going to terminate. how about this? doesn't break things on my pa8800: diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected

2007-11-29 Thread Andrew Morton
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:00:47 -0800 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:39:29 -0500 Kyle McMartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 12:35:33AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: ten million is close enough to infinity for me to assume that we broke the

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected

2007-11-29 Thread Kamalesh Babulal
Andrew Morton wrote: On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:00:47 -0800 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:39:29 -0500 Kyle McMartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 12:35:33AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: ten million is close enough to infinity for me to assume

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected

2007-11-28 Thread Kamalesh Babulal
Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:59:00 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, (cc linux-scsi, for sym53c8xx) Soft lockup is detected while bootup with 2.6.24-rc3-git2 on powerbox I assume this is a post-2.6.23 regression? BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for

Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc3-git2 softlockup detected

2007-11-28 Thread Andrew Morton
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:47:19 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton wrote: On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:59:00 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, (cc linux-scsi, for sym53c8xx) Soft lockup is detected while bootup with 2.6.24-rc3-git2 on