* Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So 2.6.24-rc3 was OK and 2.6.24-rc3-git2 is not?
Yes, the 2.6.24-rc3 was Ok and this is seen from 2.6.24-rc3-git2/3/4.
just to make sure: this is a real lockup and failed bootup (or device
init), not just a message, right?
Ingo
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So 2.6.24-rc3 was OK and 2.6.24-rc3-git2 is not?
Yes, the 2.6.24-rc3 was Ok and this is seen from 2.6.24-rc3-git2/3/4.
just to make sure: this is a real lockup and failed bootup (or device
init), not just a message, right?
* Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ingo,
This softlockup is seen in the 2.6.24-rc4 either and looks like a
message because this is seen while running tbench and machine
continues running other test's after the softlockup messages and some
times seen with the bootup, but the
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:58:06 +0530
Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:00:47 -0800 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:39:29 -0500 Kyle McMartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 12:35:33AM
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:01:08 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:47:19 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:59:00 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:01:08 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:47:19 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:59:00 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 12:35:33AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
ten million is close enough to infinity for me to assume that we broke the
driver and that's never going to terminate.
how about this? doesn't break things on my pa8800:
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sym53c8xx_2/sym_hipd.c
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:00:47 -0800 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:39:29 -0500 Kyle McMartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 12:35:33AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
ten million is close enough to infinity for me to assume that we broke the
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:00:47 -0800 Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 01:39:29 -0500 Kyle McMartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 12:35:33AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
ten million is close enough to infinity for me to assume
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:59:00 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
(cc linux-scsi, for sym53c8xx)
Soft lockup is detected while bootup with 2.6.24-rc3-git2 on powerbox
I assume this is a post-2.6.23 regression?
BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:47:19 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:59:00 +0530 Kamalesh Babulal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi,
(cc linux-scsi, for sym53c8xx)
Soft lockup is detected while bootup with 2.6.24-rc3-git2 on
11 matches
Mail list logo