Ingo,
that wont work very well as the patch relies on the new
marker_synchronize_unregister() facility.
d'oh, right you are. Should I leave this in your hands to merge?
Cheers,
Jeremy
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
* Jeremy Kerr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ingo,
that wont work very well as the patch relies on the new
marker_synchronize_unregister() facility.
d'oh, right you are. Should I leave this in your hands to merge?
would be nice if you could give your Acked-by for the sputrace bits,
then we
Ingo,
would be nice if you could give your Acked-by for the sputrace bits,
then we can merge it. It's a oneliner so it shouldnt cause merging
trouble in linux-next.
Sure!
Acked-by: Jeremy Kerr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jeremy
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing
