On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 10:40:37PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> It is really sad that the submitters of such "cleanup" patches can't be
> bothered
> to check what they are doing. They can't even be bothered to write a
> coccinelle
> script that would avoid pitfalls like this one, and they
On 9/14/23 22:24, Kees Cook wrote:
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 11:21:06PM +, Justin Stitt wrote:
`strncpy` is deprecated for use on NUL-terminated destination strings [1].
We should prefer more robust and less ambiguous string interfaces.
A suitable replacement is `strscpy` [2] due to the
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 11:21:06PM +, Justin Stitt wrote:
> `strncpy` is deprecated for use on NUL-terminated destination strings [1].
>
> We should prefer more robust and less ambiguous string interfaces.
>
> A suitable replacement is `strscpy` [2] due to the fact that it
> guarantees
`strncpy` is deprecated for use on NUL-terminated destination strings [1].
We should prefer more robust and less ambiguous string interfaces.
A suitable replacement is `strscpy` [2] due to the fact that it
guarantees NUL-termination on the destination buffer without
unnecessarily NUL-padding
