-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/p1010rdb:remove interrupts of ethernet-phy
in device tree
On Sep 12, 2013, at 1:54 AM, Liu Shengzhou-B36685 wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org]
Sent: Wednesday
-Original Message-
From: Kumar Gala [mailto:ga...@kernel.crashing.org]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 11:13 PM
To: Zhao Qiang-B45475
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Liu Shengzhou-B36685
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/p1010rdb:remove interrupts of ethernet-phy in
device tree
] powerpc/p1010rdb:remove interrupts of ethernet-phy in
device tree
On Sep 10, 2013, at 10:49 PM, Zhao Qiang wrote:
Since P1010RDB-PA and P1010RDB-PB boards use different external PHY
interrupt signals.
And actually the PHY interrupt is not used effectively with
corresponding interrupt handler
: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/p1010rdb:remove interrupts of
ethernet-phy in device tree
On Sep 10, 2013, at 10:49 PM, Zhao Qiang wrote:
Since P1010RDB-PA and P1010RDB-PB boards use different external PHY
interrupt signals.
And actually the PHY interrupt is not used effectively with
corresponding
@lists.ozlabs.org; Liu Shengzhou-B36685
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/p1010rdb:remove interrupts of
ethernet-phy in device tree
On Sep 10, 2013, at 10:49 PM, Zhao Qiang wrote:
NAK. The device tree should represent the HW not what drivers decide
to do with it.
If different board revs have
On Sep 10, 2013, at 10:49 PM, Zhao Qiang wrote:
Since P1010RDB-PA and P1010RDB-PB boards use different external PHY
interrupt signals.
And actually the PHY interrupt is not used effectively with
corresponding interrupt handler.
So we can remove the interrupts node without side-effect to
Since P1010RDB-PA and P1010RDB-PB boards use different external PHY
interrupt signals.
And actually the PHY interrupt is not used effectively with
corresponding interrupt handler.
So we can remove the interrupts node without side-effect to comply
with both P1010RDB-PA and P1010RDB-PB.
