On 02/28/2012 08:09 AM, Yin Olivia-R63875 wrote:
Hi Scott,
This had been reviewed before and accepted by internal tree.
http://linux.freescale.net/patchwork/patch/11100/
http://git.am.freescale.net/gitolite/gitweb.cgi/sdk/kvm.git/commit/?h=for-sdk1.2id=c5088844dc665dbdae4fa51b8d58dc203bacc17e
Yu-B13201
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/e500: make load_up_spe a normal fuction
On 02/27/2012 04:59 AM, Olivia Yin wrote:
So that we can call it in kernel.
Signed-off-by: Liu Yu yu@freescale.com
Explain why we want this, and point out that this makes it similar to
load_up_fpu
Yin Olivia-R63875 would like to recall the message, [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/e500:
make load_up_spe a normal fuction.
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
So that we can call it in kernel.
Signed-off-by: Liu Yu yu@freescale.com
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/head_fsl_booke.S | 23 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_fsl_booke.S
b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_fsl_booke.S
index
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:59 AM, Olivia Yin hong-hua@freescale.com wrote:
So that we can call it in kernel.
And why would we want that?
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
On 02/27/2012 04:59 AM, Olivia Yin wrote:
So that we can call it in kernel.
Signed-off-by: Liu Yu yu@freescale.com
Explain why we want this, and point out that this makes it similar to
load_up_fpu.
---
arch/powerpc/kernel/head_fsl_booke.S | 23 ++-
1 files
