On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 05:38:46PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
According to Paul there are no working implementations of LE on 32-bit cpus,
so
the syscall doesn't really make sense there.
Ummm that doesn't sound right. I don't think there is an LE linux userspace
but I'm pretty sure we
On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 09:59 +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 05:38:46PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
According to Paul there are no working implementations of LE on 32-bit
cpus, so
the syscall doesn't really make sense there.
Ummm that doesn't sound right. I don't
On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 11:07 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 09:59 +1100, Tony Breeds wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 05:38:46PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
According to Paul there are no working implementations of LE on 32-bit
cpus, so
the syscall
On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 17:38 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 15:39 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
We currently have a special syscall for switching endianness. This is
syscall number 0x1ebe, which is handled explicitly in the 64-bit syscall
exception entry.
diff
On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 15:39 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
We currently have a special syscall for switching endianness. This is
syscall number 0x1ebe, which is handled explicitly in the 64-bit syscall
exception entry.
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/systbl.h
We currently have a special syscall for switching endianness. This is
syscall number 0x1ebe, which is handled explicitly in the 64-bit syscall
exception entry.
That has a few problems, firstly the syscall number is outside of the
usual range, which confuses various tools. For example strace
On 03/11/2015 11:13 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 11:08 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 03/10/2015 04:25 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 20:34 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 18:36 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
We
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 18:36 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
We currently have a special syscall for switching endianness. This is
syscall number 0x1ebe, which is handled explicitly in the 64-bit syscall
exception entry.
That has a few problems, firstly the syscall number is outside of the
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 20:34 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 18:36 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
We currently have a special syscall for switching endianness. This is
syscall number 0x1ebe, which is handled explicitly in the 64-bit syscall
exception entry.
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 11:08 +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
On 03/10/2015 04:25 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 20:34 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 18:36 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
We currently have a special syscall for switching
On 03/10/2015 04:25 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 20:34 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 18:36 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
We currently have a special syscall for switching endianness. This is
syscall number 0x1ebe, which is handled explicitly
We currently have a special syscall for switching endianness. This is
syscall number 0x1ebe, which is handled explicitly in the 64-bit syscall
exception entry.
That has a few problems, firstly the syscall number is outside of the
usual range, which confuses various tools. For example strace
12 matches
Mail list logo
