On Sep 16, 2008, at 1:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Christian Ehrhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This adds the guest portion of the hypercall infrastructure.
Version 3 now follows the beat ABI, but proposes a new
implementation style as
static inline asm functions instead of pure assembler
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 11:42 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
+
+/* Hypercalls use the beat ABI */
+#define KVM_HYPERCALL_BIN 0x4422
Any reason this isn't 'sc' ?
Also, can we make this sc 1 so its works when we have HW hypervisor
support?
Actually, it is sc 1.
Many versions of as
On Oct 13, 2008, at 12:29 PM, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
On Mon, 2008-10-13 at 11:42 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
+
+/* Hypercalls use the beat ABI */
+#define KVM_HYPERCALL_BIN 0x4422
Any reason this isn't 'sc' ?
Also, can we make this sc 1 so its works when we have HW hypervisor
support?
From: Christian Ehrhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This adds the guest portion of the hypercall infrastructure.
Version 3 now follows the beat ABI, but proposes a new implementation style as
static inline asm functions instead of pure assembler code. That should allow
the compiler to be more flexible
