Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: perf_event: Hide iseries_check_pending_irqs

2009-10-19 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Anton Blanchard an...@samba.org wrote: If CONFIG_PPC_ISERIES isn't defined we end up with iseries_check_pending_irqs and do_work at the same address. perf ends up picking iseries_check_pending_irqs which creates confusing backtraces. Hide it. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard

Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: perf_event: Hide iseries_check_pending_irqs

2009-10-19 Thread Anton Blanchard
Hi Ingo, Just to confirm - these 3 symbol fixes are for the PowerPC tree, not for the perf events tree, right? There's nothing perf specific about the fixes - kgdb, systemtap and other debugging/instrumentation frameworks will benefit from more precise symbol generation too. Yeah, while

Re: [PATCH 3/3] powerpc: perf_event: Hide iseries_check_pending_irqs

2009-10-19 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 14:50 +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote: Hi Ingo, Just to confirm - these 3 symbol fixes are for the PowerPC tree, not for the perf events tree, right? There's nothing perf specific about the fixes - kgdb, systemtap and other debugging/instrumentation frameworks will

[PATCH 3/3] powerpc: perf_event: Hide iseries_check_pending_irqs

2009-10-18 Thread Anton Blanchard
If CONFIG_PPC_ISERIES isn't defined we end up with iseries_check_pending_irqs and do_work at the same address. perf ends up picking iseries_check_pending_irqs which creates confusing backtraces. Hide it. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard an...@samba.org -- Index: