On 10/6/2023 1:29 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 6, 2023, at 22:01, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
>> Hi Arnd,
>>
>> It doesn't look like anyone is pouncing on the syscall number in linux-
>> next currently. It might be nice to have this patch go through linux-
>> next since it touches so many
On Fri, Oct 6, 2023, at 22:01, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 10:18 -0700, Sohil Mehta wrote:
>> > If you like, I can pick this up for 6.7 through the asm-generic
>> > tree. If you think this should be part of 6.6, I would suggest
>> > to merge it through the tree that originally
On Tue, 2023-10-03 at 10:18 -0700, Sohil Mehta wrote:
> > If you like, I can pick this up for 6.7 through the asm-generic
> > tree. If you think this should be part of 6.6, I would suggest
> > to merge it through the tree that originally contained the
> > syscall code.
> >
>
> Dave, Ingo, would
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 06:58:03PM +, Sohil Mehta wrote:
> commit c35559f94ebc ("x86/shstk: Introduce map_shadow_stack syscall")
> recently added support for map_shadow_stack() but it is limited to x86
> only for now. There is a possibility that other architectures (namely,
> arm64 and
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 8:59 PM Sohil Mehta wrote:
> commit c35559f94ebc ("x86/shstk: Introduce map_shadow_stack syscall")
> recently added support for map_shadow_stack() but it is limited to x86
> only for now. There is a possibility that other architectures (namely,
> arm64 and RISC-V), that
On 10/3/2023 9:54 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 3, 2023, at 18:35, Sohil Mehta wrote:
>>
>> Gentle ping...
>>
>> Are there any additional comments? It applies cleanly on 6.6-rc4.
>>
>> Or does it seem ready to be merged? It has the following
>> acknowledgements until now:
>>
>>
On Tue, Oct 3, 2023, at 18:35, Sohil Mehta wrote:
> On 9/14/2023 11:58 AM, Sohil Mehta wrote:
>> commit c35559f94ebc ("x86/shstk: Introduce map_shadow_stack syscall")
>> recently added support for map_shadow_stack() but it is limited to x86
>> only for now. There is a possibility that other
On 9/14/2023 11:58 AM, Sohil Mehta wrote:
> commit c35559f94ebc ("x86/shstk: Introduce map_shadow_stack syscall")
> recently added support for map_shadow_stack() but it is limited to x86
> only for now. There is a possibility that other architectures (namely,
> arm64 and RISC-V), that are
Sohil Mehta writes:
> commit c35559f94ebc ("x86/shstk: Introduce map_shadow_stack syscall")
> recently added support for map_shadow_stack() but it is limited to x86
> only for now. There is a possibility that other architectures (namely,
> arm64 and RISC-V), that are implementing equivalent
On Thu, 2023-09-14 at 18:58 +, Sohil Mehta wrote:
> commit c35559f94ebc ("x86/shstk: Introduce map_shadow_stack syscall")
> recently added support for map_shadow_stack() but it is limited to
> x86
> only for now. There is a possibility that other architectures
> (namely,
> arm64 and RISC-V),
commit c35559f94ebc ("x86/shstk: Introduce map_shadow_stack syscall")
recently added support for map_shadow_stack() but it is limited to x86
only for now. There is a possibility that other architectures (namely,
arm64 and RISC-V), that are implementing equivalent support for shadow
stacks, might
11 matches
Mail list logo
