Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc: Replace GPL 2.0+ README.legal boilerplate with SPDX

2023-09-19 Thread Michael Ellerman
Geert Uytterhoeven writes: > Hi Michael, > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 4:13 AM Michael Ellerman wrote: >> Geert Uytterhoeven writes: >> > Upstream Linux never had a "README.legal" file, but it was present >> > in early source releases of Linux/m68k. It contained a simple copyright >> > notice

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc: Replace GPL 2.0+ README.legal boilerplate with SPDX

2023-09-19 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Hi Michael, On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 4:13 AM Michael Ellerman wrote: > Geert Uytterhoeven writes: > > Upstream Linux never had a "README.legal" file, but it was present > > in early source releases of Linux/m68k. It contained a simple copyright > > notice and a link to a version of the

Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc: Replace GPL 2.0+ README.legal boilerplate with SPDX

2023-09-18 Thread Michael Ellerman
Geert Uytterhoeven writes: > Upstream Linux never had a "README.legal" file, but it was present > in early source releases of Linux/m68k. It contained a simple copyright > notice and a link to a version of the "COPYING" file that predated the > addition of the "only valid GPL version is v2"

[PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc: Replace GPL 2.0+ README.legal boilerplate with SPDX

2023-09-18 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
Upstream Linux never had a "README.legal" file, but it was present in early source releases of Linux/m68k. It contained a simple copyright notice and a link to a version of the "COPYING" file that predated the addition of the "only valid GPL version is v2" clause. Get rid of the references to