On Sat, Oct 08, 2022 at 09:53:33PM +, David Laight wrote:
> From: Jason A. Donenfeld
> > Sent: 07 October 2022 18:56
> ...
> > > Given these kinds of less mechanical changes, it may make sense to split
> > > these from the "trivial" conversions in a treewide patch. The chance of
> > > needing
From: Jason A. Donenfeld
> Sent: 07 October 2022 18:56
...
> > Given these kinds of less mechanical changes, it may make sense to split
> > these from the "trivial" conversions in a treewide patch. The chance of
> > needing a revert from the simple 1:1 conversions is much lower than the
> > need
On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 10:12:42AM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 08:07:58AM -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 04:57:24AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Le 07/10/2022 à 01:36, Jason A. Donenfeld a écrit :
> > > > On 10/6/22,
On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 08:07:58AM -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 04:57:24AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >
> >
> > Le 07/10/2022 à 01:36, Jason A. Donenfeld a écrit :
> > > On 10/6/22, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Le 06/10/2022 à 19:31,
On Fri, Oct 07, 2022 at 04:57:24AM +, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 07/10/2022 à 01:36, Jason A. Donenfeld a écrit :
> > On 10/6/22, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Le 06/10/2022 à 19:31, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Le 06/10/2022 à 19:24, Jason A. Donenfeld a
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 10:53:44AM -0600, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> drivers/thunderbolt/xdomain.c | 2 +-
Acked-by: Mika Westerberg
From: Christophe Leroy
> Sent: 06 October 2022 18:43
...
> But taking into account that sp must remain 16 bytes aligned, would it
> be better to do something like ?
>
> sp -= prandom_u32_max(PAGE_SIZE >> 4) << 4;
That makes me think...
If prandom_u32_max() is passed a (constant) power of 2
Le 07/10/2022 à 01:36, Jason A. Donenfeld a écrit :
> On 10/6/22, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 06/10/2022 à 19:31, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 06/10/2022 à 19:24, Jason A. Donenfeld a écrit :
Hi Christophe,
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 11:21 AM Christophe Leroy
On 10/6/22, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 06/10/2022 à 19:31, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
>>
>>
>> Le 06/10/2022 à 19:24, Jason A. Donenfeld a écrit :
>>> Hi Christophe,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 11:21 AM Christophe Leroy
>>> wrote:
Le 06/10/2022 à 18:53, Jason A. Donenfeld a écrit :
Le 06/10/2022 à 19:31, Christophe Leroy a écrit :
Le 06/10/2022 à 19:24, Jason A. Donenfeld a écrit :
Hi Christophe,
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 11:21 AM Christophe Leroy
wrote:
Le 06/10/2022 à 18:53, Jason A. Donenfeld a écrit :
The prandom_u32() function has been a deprecated inline
Le 06/10/2022 à 19:24, Jason A. Donenfeld a écrit :
> Hi Christophe,
>
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 11:21 AM Christophe Leroy
> wrote:
>> Le 06/10/2022 à 18:53, Jason A. Donenfeld a écrit :
>>> The prandom_u32() function has been a deprecated inline wrapper around
>>> get_random_u32() for several
Hi Christophe,
On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 11:21 AM Christophe Leroy
wrote:
> Le 06/10/2022 à 18:53, Jason A. Donenfeld a écrit :
> > The prandom_u32() function has been a deprecated inline wrapper around
> > get_random_u32() for several releases now, and compiles down to the
> > exact same code.
Le 06/10/2022 à 18:53, Jason A. Donenfeld a écrit :
> The prandom_u32() function has been a deprecated inline wrapper around
> get_random_u32() for several releases now, and compiles down to the
> exact same code. Replace the deprecated wrapper with a direct call to
> the real function. The same
The prandom_u32() function has been a deprecated inline wrapper around
get_random_u32() for several releases now, and compiles down to the
exact same code. Replace the deprecated wrapper with a direct call to
the real function. The same also applies to get_random_int(), which is
just a wrapper
14 matches
Mail list logo
