Dear Tirumala Marri,
In message 49073d172310031addb3aa7d08a60...@mail.gmail.com you wrote:
I am thinking that we can combine arches, Canyonlands, glacier, redwood
and eiger can be combined as ppc46x_defconfig.
We already have arch/powerpc/configs/ppc40x_defconfig and
We already have arch/powerpc/configs/ppc40x_defconfig and
arch/powerpc/configs/ppc44x_defconfig in mainline.
What's wrong with using these?
[Marri] Great we already have it. We should remove the defconfigs under
44x then ?
Regards,
Marri
___
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:49:14 -0700
Tirumala Marri tma...@apm.com wrote:
[Marri] Great we already have it. We should remove the defconfigs
under 44x then ?
I'd rather we didn't. I thought Linus' beef was over the churn in the
defconfigs, not the fact that they exist. The 44x defconfigs change
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:49:14 -0700
Tirumala Marri tma...@apm.com wrote:
[Marri] Great we already have it. We should remove the defconfigs
under 44x then ?
I'd rather we didn't. I thought Linus' beef was over the churn in the
defconfigs, not the fact that they exist. The 44x defconfigs
Hi,
On Thu, 9 Sep 2010 15:17:10 -0700 Tirumala Marri tma...@apm.com wrote:
[Marri]That is kind of true. Can we create new defconfigs then ?
I am trying to check-in new defconfig.
Just make sure that it is minimal by using make savedefconfig. This
will create a file defconfig in the current
Is anyone working on Linus suggestion to combine the defconfigs under 44x
or 4xx ?
Thanks,
Marri
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
Is anyone working on combining defconfigs for 44x or 4xx devices ?
Regards,
Marri
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 03:40:37PM -0700, Tirumala Marri wrote:
Is anyone working on Linus suggestion to combine the defconfigs under 44x
or 4xx ?
Linus made a suggestion to that effect? If so, I missed it. Have a
pointer?
josh
___
Linuxppc-dev
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 03:40:37PM -0700, Tirumala Marri wrote:
Is anyone working on Linus suggestion to combine the defconfigs under 44x
or 4xx ?
Do you mean ppc44x_defconfig? Already there.
-Olof
___
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Hi Marri,
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010 15:39:29 -0700 Tirumala Marri tma...@apm.com wrote:
Is anyone working on Linus suggestion to combine the defconfigs under 44x
or 4xx ?
Are arch/powerpc/configs/ppc44x_defconfig and ppc40x_defconfig what you want?
Or do you mean the Kconfig based versions?
--
Linus made a suggestion to that effect? If so, I missed it. Have a
pointer?
There was discussion going on in arm-kernel mailing list. And I see some
patches being submitted for ARM based boards.
I think we can also combine some of the defconfigs under
arch/powerpc/configs/44x/ directory.
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 03:40:37PM -0700, Tirumala Marri wrote:
Is anyone working on Linus suggestion to combine the defconfigs under
44x
or 4xx ?
Do you mean ppc44x_defconfig? Already there.
No it is not there yet. I should have said Linus suggestion about
defconfigs in ARM mailing list.
Linus made a suggestion to that effect? If so, I missed it. Have a
pointer?
I am thinking that we can combine arches, Canyonlands, glacier, redwood
and eiger can be combined as ppc46x_defconfig.
here is the defconfig example ---
#
# Automatically generated make config: don't edit
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 07:11:11PM -0700, Tirumala Marri wrote:
On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 03:40:37PM -0700, Tirumala Marri wrote:
Is anyone working on Linus suggestion to combine the defconfigs under
44x
or 4xx ?
Do you mean ppc44x_defconfig? Already there.
No it is not there yet. I
14 matches
Mail list logo
