On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 8:14 AM, FIXED-TERM Seeh Thomas
(BEG/EMS1)fixed-term.thomas.s...@de.bosch.com wrote:
--snip-
[ 2346.499181] VFS: Mounted root (nfs filesystem) on device 0:11.
[ 2346.505748] Freeing unused kernel memory: 160k init
[ 2346.865420] net eth0:
Hello everyone,
I'll try to run a 2.6.31-rc7 kernel on my Lite5200 board.
For the device tree I use lite5200.dts and compiled it simply with
make ARCH=powerpc CROSS_COMPILE=ppc_6xx- lite5200.dtb
But I'm not sure what configuration for the kernel I should choose. There is no
Dear FIXED-TERM Seeh Thomas (BEG/EMS1),
In message 6e9d235b18ce694399d781f05d9c42e79f0c2...@si-mbx11.de.bosch.com you
wrote:
I'll try to run a 2.6.31-rc7 kernel on my Lite5200 board.
Is this really a Lite5200, or is it a Lite5200B?
Hint: if U-Boot prints something like CPU: MPC5200B v2.2,
Dear Mr Denk,
thanks for your reply. I checked out kernel 2.6.30.3 stable for testing too.
I mean it's really a Lite5200. That is the U-boot boot message:
U-Boot 2009.06 (Aug 26 2009 - 08:23:36)
CPU: MPC5200 v1.2, Core v1.1 at 231 MHz
Bus 66 MHz, IPB 33 MHz, PCI 16.500
FIXED-TERM Seeh Thomas (BEG/EMS1) wrote:
Dear Mr Denk,
thanks for your reply. I checked out kernel 2.6.30.3 stable for testing too.
I mean it's really a Lite5200. That is the U-boot boot message:
Just to be sure. The old Lite5200 eval board has *one* PCI slot, while
the new Lite5200B has
FIXED-TERM Seeh Thomas (BEG/EMS1) wrote:
Dear Mr Denk,
thanks for your reply. I checked out kernel 2.6.30.3 stable for testing too.
I mean it's really a Lite5200. That is the U-boot boot message:
Just to be sure. The old Lite5200 eval board has *one* PCI slot, while
the new Lite5200B has
