Christian Zigotzky writes:
> On 24 January 2020 at 12:42 pm, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>> Ulf Hansson writes:
>>> On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 12:18, Christian Zigotzky
>>> wrote:
Hi All,
We still need the attached patch for our onboard SD card interface
[1,2]. Could you please add
On 24 January 2020 at 12:42 pm, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Ulf Hansson writes:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 12:18, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
Hi All,
We still need the attached patch for our onboard SD card interface
[1,2]. Could you please add this patch to the tree?
No, because according to
Ulf Hansson writes:
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 12:18, Christian Zigotzky
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> We still need the attached patch for our onboard SD card interface
>> [1,2]. Could you please add this patch to the tree?
>
> No, because according to previous discussion that isn't the correct
>
On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 at 10:17, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
>
> Am 16.01.20 um 16:46 schrieb Ulf Hansson:
> > On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 12:18, Christian Zigotzky
> > wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> We still need the attached patch for our onboard SD card interface
> >> [1,2]. Could you please add this
Am 16.01.20 um 16:46 schrieb Ulf Hansson:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 12:18, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
Hi All,
We still need the attached patch for our onboard SD card interface
[1,2]. Could you please add this patch to the tree?
No, because according to previous discussion that isn't the correct
On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 12:18, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> We still need the attached patch for our onboard SD card interface
> [1,2]. Could you please add this patch to the tree?
No, because according to previous discussion that isn't the correct
solution and more importantly it
Hi All,
We still need the attached patch for our onboard SD card interface
[1,2]. Could you please add this patch to the tree?
Thanks,
Christian
[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mmc/msg56211.html
[2]
http://forum.hyperion-entertainment.com/viewtopic.php?f=58=4349=20#p49012
diff
FYI: The onboard SD card works also with the RC6 of kernel 5.4 with the
patch below.
-- Christian
On 23 October 2019 at 4:20pm, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
Hello,
The patch below works. I compiled the RC4 of kernel 5.4 with this patch today
and the onboard SD card works without any problems.
On Fri, 2019-10-25 at 23:39 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 05:28:45PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > This doesn't work?:
> >
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC) || of_dma_is_coherent(dev-
> > >of_node))
> > value |= ESDHC_DMA_SNOOP;
> > else
>
On Fri, 2019-10-25 at 17:28 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> This doesn't work?:
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC) || of_dma_is_coherent(dev-
> >of_node))
> value |= ESDHC_DMA_SNOOP;
> else
> value &= ~ESDHC_DMA_SNOOP;
CONFIG_PPC is restrictive. What about
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 05:28:45PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> This doesn't work?:
>
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC) || of_dma_is_coherent(dev->of_node))
> value |= ESDHC_DMA_SNOOP;
> else
> value &= ~ESDHC_DMA_SNOOP;
>
> While I said use the
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 9:32 AM Russell King - ARM Linux admin
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 08:52:33AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > I think this should have been done the other way around and default to
> > > coherent since most traditional OF platforms are coherent, and you
> > > can't
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 08:52:33AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> > I think this should have been done the other way around and default to
> > coherent since most traditional OF platforms are coherent, and you
> > can't just require those DTs to change.
>
> You can blame me. This was really only
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 08:52:33AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 1:41 AM Benjamin Herrenschmidt
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 16:42 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > >
> > > Right, it seems of_dma_is_coherent() has baked in the assumption that
> > > devices are
Hello,
The patch below works. I compiled the RC4 of kernel 5.4 with this patch today
and the onboard SD card works without any problems.
Thanks!
Christian
> On 23. Oct 2019, at 07:42, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> Russell King - ARM Linux admin writes:
>>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 03:12:49PM
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 1:41 AM Benjamin Herrenschmidt
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 16:42 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> >
> > Right, it seems of_dma_is_coherent() has baked in the assumption that
> > devices are non-coherent unless explicitly marked as coherent.
> >
> > Which is wrong on
On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 16:42 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>
> Right, it seems of_dma_is_coherent() has baked in the assumption that
> devices are non-coherent unless explicitly marked as coherent.
>
> Which is wrong on all or at least most existing powerpc systems
> according to Ben.
This is
Russell King - ARM Linux admin writes:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 03:12:49PM +0200, Christian Zigotzky wrote:
>> Hello Russell,
>>
>> You asked me about "dma-coherent" in the Cyrus device tree. Unfortunately I
>> don't find the property "dma-coherent" in the dtb source files.
>>
>> Output of
18 matches
Mail list logo
