On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 12:34:53PM +, David Laight wrote:
> From: Segher Boessenkool
> > Sent: 16 December 2021 18:56
> ...
> > > The only remaining problem here is reinterpreting a char* pointer to a
> > > u32*, e.g., for accessing the IP address in an Ethernet frame when
> > > NET_IP_ALIGN
From: Segher Boessenkool
> Sent: 16 December 2021 18:56
...
> > The only remaining problem here is reinterpreting a char* pointer to a
> > u32*, e.g., for accessing the IP address in an Ethernet frame when
> > NET_IP_ALIGN == 2, which could suffer from the same UB problem again,
> > as I
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 06:29:40PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> I think this series is a huge improvement, but it does not solve the
> UB problem completely. As we found, there are open issues in the GCC
> bugzilla regarding assumptions in the compiler that aligned quantities
> either overlap
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 9:29 AM Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>
> CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS is used in many places to
> conditionally emit code that violates C alignment rules. E.g., there
> is this example in Documentation/core-api/unaligned-memory-access.rst:
>
> bool
From: Ard Biesheuvel
> Sent: 16 December 2021 17:30
>
> Hi Arnd,
>
> (replying to an old thread as this came up in the discussion regarding
> misaligned loads and stored in siphash() when compiled for ARM
> [f7e5b9bfa6c8820407b64eabc1f29c9a87e8993d])
>
> On Fri, 14 May 2021 at 12:02, Arnd
Hi Arnd,
(replying to an old thread as this came up in the discussion regarding
misaligned loads and stored in siphash() when compiled for ARM
[f7e5b9bfa6c8820407b64eabc1f29c9a87e8993d])
On Fri, 14 May 2021 at 12:02, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> From: Arnd Bergmann
>
> The
On 5/14/21 12:22 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:52 AM Vineet Gupta
> wrote:
>> Wasn't the new zlib code slated for 5.14. I don't see it in your master yet
> You're right, I never actually committed it, since it was specific to
> ARC and -O3
Well, not really, the issue
On 5/14/21 10:32 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 3:02 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> I've included this version in the asm-generic tree for 5.14 already,
>> addressing the few issues that were pointed out in the RFC. If there
>> are any remaining problems, I hope those can be
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 12:45 PM Vineet Gupta
wrote:
>
> Well, not really, the issue manifested in ARC O3 testing, but I showed
> the problem existed for arm64 gcc too.
.. but not with a supported kernel configuration.
> > So in fact it's not even queued up for 5.14 due to this all, I just
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 7:32 PM Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 3:02 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > I've included this version in the asm-generic tree for 5.14 already,
> > addressing the few issues that were pointed out in the RFC. If there
> > are any remaining problems, I
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 11:52 AM Vineet Gupta
wrote:
>
> Wasn't the new zlib code slated for 5.14. I don't see it in your master yet
You're right, I never actually committed it, since it was specific to
ARC and -O3 and I wasn't entirely happy with the amount of testing it
got (with Heiko
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 3:02 AM Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> I've included this version in the asm-generic tree for 5.14 already,
> addressing the few issues that were pointed out in the RFC. If there
> are any remaining problems, I hope those can be addressed as follow-up
> patches.
This continues
12 matches
Mail list logo
