On Mon, Apr 15, 2024 at 12:43:16PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 07:05:24PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> > index 45a280f2161c..b4d6868df573 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> >
On Thu, Apr 11, 2024 at 07:05:24PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> index 45a280f2161c..b4d6868df573 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
> @@ -504,17 +513,17 @@ void
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 11:08:00AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> > for (s = start; s < end; s++) {
> > void *addr = (void *)s + *s;
> > + void *wr_addr = addr + module_writable_offset(mod, addr);
>
> So instead of repeating this pattern in a
* Mike Rapoport wrote:
> for (s = start; s < end; s++) {
> void *addr = (void *)s + *s;
> + void *wr_addr = addr + module_writable_offset(mod, addr);
So instead of repeating this pattern in a dozen of places, why not use a
simpler method:
void
