Re: cpu_clock confusion (was: printk time confusion?)

2008-04-24 Thread Johannes Berg
[2.764009 (3/3)] [4.272241 (2/2)] [4.272322 (2/2)] [4.272375 (2/2)] [2.948002 (3/3)] As you can see, I added printk_cpu and smp_processor_id() to the printk timestamp output and thus it is obvious that the different times come from different CPUs. the

cpu_clock confusion (was: printk time confusion?)

2008-04-04 Thread Johannes Berg
Hi, Not sure whether the lockdep patches or something else is causing this as I haven't checked w/o the patches yet, but I seem to be having some confusion of printk timestamps: Tried reverting the patches ? That didn't help, so it's not the lockdep patches causing it. I'm still seeing

Re: cpu_clock confusion (was: printk time confusion?)

2008-04-04 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Johannes Berg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, Not sure whether the lockdep patches or something else is causing this as I haven't checked w/o the patches yet, but I seem to be having some confusion of printk timestamps: Tried reverting the patches ? That didn't help, so it's