* Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote:
Hi Yinghai,
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:00:06 -0700 Yinghai Lu ying...@kernel.org wrote:
Also, we may need to remove all extern and __init and __initdata etc in .h
files.
please check
[PATCH -v3] memblock: Fix section mismatch
On 09/13/2010 09:50 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Yinghai,
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 01:24:20 -0700 Yinghai Lu ying...@kernel.org wrote:
On 09/12/2010 09:39 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Your patch fixes some of the warnings, but still leaves these for a
powerpc allnoconfig build:
WARNING:
Hi Yinghai,
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:00:06 -0700 Yinghai Lu ying...@kernel.org wrote:
Also, we may need to remove all extern and __init and __initdata etc in .h
files.
Do not remove the extern key word.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwells...@canb.auug.org.au
On 09/14/2010 05:29 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Yinghai,
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:00:06 -0700 Yinghai Lu ying...@kernel.org wrote:
Also, we may need to remove all extern and __init and __initdata etc in .h
files.
Do not remove the extern key word.
why? you got another warning?
Hi Yinghai,
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 18:33:34 -0700 Yinghai Lu ying...@kernel.org wrote:
On 09/14/2010 05:29 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Do not remove the extern key word.
why? you got another warning?
It is normal C coding practice to mark declarations in header files with
extern. It
Hi Yinghai,
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:00:06 -0700 Yinghai Lu ying...@kernel.org wrote:
Also, we may need to remove all extern and __init and __initdata etc in .h
files.
please check
[PATCH -v3] memblock: Fix section mismatch warning
Use __init_memblock to replace __init, and remove
On 09/12/2010 09:39 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Your patch fixes some of the warnings, but still leaves these for a
powerpc allnoconfig build:
WARNING: mm/built-in.o(.text+0x25d80): Section mismatch in reference from the
function memblock_double_array() to the function
Hi Yinghai,
On Mon, 13 Sep 2010 01:24:20 -0700 Yinghai Lu ying...@kernel.org wrote:
On 09/12/2010 09:39 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Your patch fixes some of the warnings, but still leaves these for a
powerpc allnoconfig build:
WARNING: mm/built-in.o(.text+0x25d80): Section mismatch
Hi all,
After merging the scsi-post-merge tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allnoconfig, i386 defconfig and others) produced these warnings (I build
with CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y):
WARNING: mm/built-in.o(.text+0x25910): Section mismatch in reference from the
function
Hi Yinghai,
On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 21:14:15 -0700 Yinghai Lu ying...@kernel.org wrote:
please check it, and it should get into core/memblock branch.
Thanks
Yinghai
[PATCH] memblock: Fix section mismatch warning
for arches that use memblock other than x86
Reported-by: Stephen
On 09/12/2010 08:27 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the scsi-post-merge tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allnoconfig, i386 defconfig and others) produced these warnings (I build
with CONFIG_DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH=y):
WARNING: mm/built-in.o(.text+0x25910): Section
11 matches
Mail list logo
