On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 10:20 -0500, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> On
> > I don't remember why :-) I think I didn't want to mess with the OPD
> > fixup in glibc back then.
> >
>
> Does it make sense to just drop the unused VDS64_HAS_DESCRIPTORS code
> then?
I'd think so yes.
Cheers,
Ben.
On 2/24/20 5:17 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Sat, 2020-02-22 at 18:07 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
so I don't believe they are ever used by default -- in this case
V_FUNCTION_BEGIN doesn't add to the .opd section with .name, .TOC base,
etc.
Manually setting VDS64_HAS_DESCRIPTORS
On Sat, 2020-02-22 at 18:07 -0600, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >
> > so I don't believe they are ever used by default -- in this case
> > V_FUNCTION_BEGIN doesn't add to the .opd section with .name, .TOC base,
> > etc.
> >
> > Manually setting VDS64_HAS_DESCRIPTORS results in a vdso64.so in
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 11:08:52AM -0500, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> I was wondering if there was history behind VDS64_HAS_DESCRIPTORS and in
> what cases would one want to turn them on? (Note, I'm assuming they are
> an implementation of Function Descriptors. [1])
It's from the very first patch
I was wondering if there was history behind VDS64_HAS_DESCRIPTORS and in
what cases would one want to turn them on? (Note, I'm assuming they are
an implementation of Function Descriptors. [1])
arch/powerpc/include/asm/vdso.h unsets the macro:
/* Define if 64 bits VDSO has procedure
