On 06/14/11 17:34, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
have someone tried to support RELOCATABLE kernel on ppc44x?
As Josh, mentioned, I will be working on this. In fact I was trying a couple of
patches towards this on PPC440x. But, I am stuck in debugging the hang that I am
experiencing with the changes.
Joakim Tjernlund/Transmode wrote on 2011/06/14 20:00:09:
From: Joakim Tjernlund/Transmode
Dan Malek ppc6...@digitaldans.com wrote on 2011/06/14 18:06:45:
Hi Joakim.
On Jun 14, 2011, at 6:54 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Various kernel asm modifies SRR0/SRR1 just before executing
Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote on 2011/06/14 21:31:06:
Hi Joakim,
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 03:54:45PM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
This is a backport from 2.6 which I did to overcome 8xx CPU
bugs. 8xx does not update the DAR register when taking a TLB
error caused by dcbX and icbi
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 09:30:47PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 06/14/2011 02:33 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Why on earth restrict it like that? It's just a device driver, like
more or less any other device driver...
I'd say any other classic ISA/PC driver, including floppy, gameport
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 09:31:27PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 06/14/2011 03:08 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
I took a look at the back of all my ia64 systems - none of them
have a parallel port. It seems unlikely that new systems will
start adding parallel ports :-)
So even if I had a
2011/6/15 Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de
config SCORE
- def_bool y
- select HAVE_GENERIC_HARDIRQS
- select GENERIC_IRQ_SHOW
+ def_bool y
+ select HAVE_GENERIC_HARDIRQS
+ select HAVE_PC_PARPORT
+ select GENERIC_IRQ_SHOW
choice
prompt
PT7C4338 chip is being manufactured by Pericom Technology Inc.
It is a serial real-time clock which provides:
1)Low-power clock/calendar.
2)Programmable square-wave output.
It has 56 bytes of nonvolatile RAM.
Its register set is same as that of rtc device: DS1307.
Signed-off-by: Priyanka Jain
Dan Malek ppc6...@digitaldans.com wrote on 2011/06/14 20:11:18:
Hi Joakim.
On Jun 14, 2011, at 11:00 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
I don't have a mpc850, do you?
I have to say I do :-)
Probably but that is another matter. You could continue with that
if you like but I am stopping here
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 09:18:36PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 06/14/2011 03:34 PM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
There is no point in offering to build something that couldn't possibly be
used. It just makes the kernel harder to configure and inflates the test
matrix for no good reason.
The PPC440X currently uses 256M TLB entries to pin the
lowmem. When we go for a relocatable kernel we have to :
1) Restrict the kernel load address to be 256M aligned
OR
2) Use 16M TLB(the next possible TLB page size supported)
entries till the first
256M and then use the 256M TLB
On Wednesday 15 June 2011, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 06/14/2011 02:33 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Why on earth restrict it like that? It's just a device driver, like
more or less any other device driver...
I'd say any other classic ISA/PC driver, including floppy, gameport or
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:30 AM, David Laight david.lai...@aculab.comwrote:
The PPC440X currently uses 256M TLB entries to pin the
lowmem. When we go for a relocatable kernel we have to :
1) Restrict the kernel load address to be 256M aligned
OR
2) Use 16M TLB(the next possible
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 11:43 +0530, Suzuki Poulose wrote:
On 06/14/11 17:34, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
have someone tried to support RELOCATABLE kernel on ppc44x?
As Josh, mentioned, I will be working on this. In fact I was trying a couple
of
patches towards this on PPC440x. But, I am
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 10:30 +0100, David Laight wrote:
The PPC440X currently uses 256M TLB entries to pin the
lowmem. When we go for a relocatable kernel we have to :
1) Restrict the kernel load address to be 256M aligned
OR
2) Use 16M TLB(the next possible TLB page size
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 11:46, Arnd Bergmann a...@arndb.de wrote:
* In case of floppies, the solution was to write a driver for every
platform that
doesn't have PIO, since they tend to have other differences. The amiflop and
ataflop drivers are not even use readb(), they just derefence
Priyanka Jain wrote:
+ * Copyright (C) 2011 Priyanka Jain (priyanka.j...@freescale.com)
+ * (pt7c4338 support)
You can't claim copyright just by adding one line of text.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
On 06/15/11 15:41, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 11:43 +0530, Suzuki Poulose wrote:
On 06/14/11 17:34, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
have someone tried to support RELOCATABLE kernel on ppc44x?
As Josh, mentioned, I will be working on this. In fact I was trying a couple of
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 04:34:37AM -0400, Ralf Baechle wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 09:18:36PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 06/14/2011 03:34 PM, Ralf Baechle wrote:
There is no point in offering to build something that couldn't possibly be
used. It just makes the kernel harder
Priyanka Jain wrote:
config RTC_DRV_DS1307
- tristate Dallas/Maxim DS1307/37/38/39/40, ST M41T00, EPSON RX-8025
+ tristate Dallas/Maxim DS1307/37/38/39/40, ST M41T00, EPSON RX-8025,
PT7C4338
help
If you say yes here you get support for various compatible RTC
On 06/15/2011 12:47 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
OK, serial-8250 is clearly just plain wrong, since the 8250 series UARTs
are ubiquitous across just about every platform.
Floppy is special (in the short bus sense), since it is closely tied to
ISA DMA. Conditionalizing this on ISA DMA
On 06/15/2011 12:39 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 09:31:27PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 06/14/2011 03:08 PM, Luck, Tony wrote:
I took a look at the back of all my ia64 systems - none of them
have a parallel port. It seems unlikely that new systems will
The audit system previously expected arches calling to audit_syscall_exit to
supply as arguments if the syscall was a success and what the return code was.
Audit also provides a helper AUDITSC_RESULT which was supposed to simplify
things
by converting from negative retcodes to an audit internal
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 08:08:05AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 06/15/2011 12:47 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
OK, serial-8250 is clearly just plain wrong, since the 8250 series UARTs
are ubiquitous across just about every platform.
Floppy is special (in the short bus sense),
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Suzuki Poulose suz...@in.ibm.com wrote:
On 06/15/11 15:41, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 11:43 +0530, Suzuki Poulose wrote:
On 06/14/11 17:34, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
have someone tried to support RELOCATABLE kernel on ppc44x?
As
Hi Jeff,
It appears that commit 7b3a24c57d2eeda8dba9c205342b12689c4679f9 broke
CD-ROMs on the IPR SATA bus on powerpc machines:
ata_port_alloc: ENTER
ata_port_probe: ata1: bus probe begin
ata1.00: ata_dev_read_id: ENTER
ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x40)
ata1.00:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 20:11:55 +1000
Benjamin Herrenschmidt b...@kernel.crashing.org wrote:
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 11:43 +0530, Suzuki Poulose wrote:
On 06/14/11 17:34, Michal Simek wrote:
Hi,
have someone tried to support RELOCATABLE kernel on ppc44x?
As Josh, mentioned, I will be
On 06/15/2011 02:17 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
From what I can tell, the only place that explicitly clears the FROZEN
flag is the error-handling code via ata_eh_thaw_port().
So I thought either we're not invoking the error-handler at probe time
correctly to kick the port or perhaps the
On 15.06.2011 [15:02:18 -0500], Brian King wrote:
On 06/15/2011 02:17 PM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
From what I can tell, the only place that explicitly clears the FROZEN
flag is the error-handling code via ata_eh_thaw_port().
So I thought either we're not invoking the error-handler at
On Wed, Jun 08, 2011 at 12:08:55PM +0530, Suzuki Poulose wrote:
Hi,
This is version 2 of the patch
Changes from Version 1 :
: Changed the interface for read_memory_region_limits to use 'int fd'
instead of FILE*.
: Use sizeof(variable) for read(, instead of sizeof(type).
---
PT7C4338 chip is being manufactured by Pericom Technology Inc.
It is a serial real-time clock which provides:
1)Low-power clock/calendar.
2)Programmable square-wave output.
It has 56 bytes of nonvolatile RAM.
Its register set is same as that of rtc device: DS1307.
Signed-off-by: Priyanka Jain
30 matches
Mail list logo
