Re: [PATCH 0/7] powerpc: remove the legacy iSeries platform specific drivers

2012-03-08 Thread Jens Axboe
On 03/08/2012 05:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: It would probably be easiest if all these patches were merged via the powerpc tree to eliminate any dependencies between them. Their impact on generic code is very small. Go ahead, no point in doing otherwise. -- Jens Axboe

Re: [PATCH 5/7] tty: powerpc: remove SERIAL_ICOM dependency on PPC_ISERIES

2012-03-08 Thread Alan Cox
On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 15:39:31 +1100 Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au wrote: The PowerPC legacy iSeries platform is being removed so this is no longer selectable. Fine by me ___ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org

RE: [PATCH 2/4] fsl_pci: Add a workaround for PCI 5 errata in MPC8548

2012-03-08 Thread Zhao Chenhui-B35336
On Mar 6, 2012, at 3:10 AM, Zhao Chenhui wrote: + if ((fsl_svr_is(SVR_8548) || fsl_svr_is(SVR_8548_E)) Should this also have 8547, 8547E, 8545, 8545E, 8543, 8543E? Yes. I will include these chips. -Chenhui + !early_find_capability(hose, 0, 0,

Re: [PATCH] PPC: Don't sync timebase when inside VM

2012-03-08 Thread McClintock Matthew-B29882
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote: On 03/02/2012 10:30 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: On 02.03.2012, at 17:20, Scott Wood wrote: On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 03:12:33PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: When running inside a virtual machine, we can not modify

Re: [PATCH 0/7] powerpc: remove the legacy iSeries platform specific drivers

2012-03-08 Thread Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 03:28:53PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi all, This series of patches removes all the legacy iSeries platform specific drivers (and the iSeries specific part of one). The legacy iSeries platform main code has already bee removed along with CONFIG_PPC_ISERIES, so

Re: [PATCH] PPC: Don't sync timebase when inside VM

2012-03-08 Thread Scott Wood
On 03/08/2012 11:31 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote: On 03/02/2012 10:30 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: On 02.03.2012, at 17:20, Scott Wood wrote: Again, for 85xx we should *never* sync the timebase in the kernel,

Re: [PATCH] PPC: Don't sync timebase when inside VM

2012-03-08 Thread McClintock Matthew-B29882
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote: On 03/08/2012 11:31 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote: On 03/02/2012 10:30 AM, Alexander Graf wrote: On 02.03.2012, at 17:20, Scott Wood

Re: [PATCH] PPC: Don't sync timebase when inside VM

2012-03-08 Thread Scott Wood
On 03/08/2012 12:24 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote: On 03/08/2012 11:31 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote: On 03/02/2012 10:30 AM,

Re: [PATCH] PPC: Don't sync timebase when inside VM

2012-03-08 Thread McClintock Matthew-B29882
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote: On 03/08/2012 12:24 PM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Scott Wood scottw...@freescale.com wrote: On 03/08/2012 11:31 AM, McClintock Matthew-B29882 wrote: On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 11:17

Re: [PATCH 19/38] KVM: PPC: e500mc: add load inst fixup

2012-03-08 Thread Marcelo Tosatti
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 01:09:47AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: There's always a chance we're unable to read a guest instruction. The guest could have its TLB mapped execute-, but not readable, something odd happens and our TLB gets flushed. So it's a good idea to be prepared for that case and

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with the arm tree

2012-03-08 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 16:52 +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 14:51 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi Mikey, On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:33:56 +1100 Michael Neuling mi...@neuling.org wrote: Surely we only need SPARSE_IRQ now and not MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ.

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with the arm tree

2012-03-08 Thread Russell King
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 10:35:46AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: Actually, I didn't keep MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ, I kept HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ. If I remove it, then I get Kconfig warnings: warning: (PPC) selects SPARSE_IRQ which has unmet direct dependencies (HAVE_GENERIC_HARDIRQS

linux-next: manual merge of the pci tree with the powerpc tree

2012-03-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Jesse, Today's linux-next merge of the pci tree got a conflict in arch/powerpc/platforms/iseries/pci.c between commit 8ee3e0d69623 (powerpc: Remove the main legacy iSerie platform code) from the powerpc tree and commit 673c97562489 (powerpc/PCI: replace pci_probe_only with pci_flags) from the

linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the powerpc tree

2012-03-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/iseries_veth.c between commit e92a665949f6 (net: powerpc: remove the legacy iSeries ethernet driver) from the powerpc tree and commit 41de8d4cff21 (drivers/net: Remove alloc_etherdev error messages)

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the powerpc tree with the arm tree

2012-03-08 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 00:39 +, Russell King wrote: On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 10:35:46AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: Actually, I didn't keep MAY_HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ, I kept HAVE_SPARSE_IRQ. If I remove it, then I get Kconfig warnings: warning: (PPC) selects SPARSE_IRQ which has

[PATCH 1/2] powerpc/44x: Fix PCI MSI support for Maui APM821xx SoC and Bluestone board

2012-03-08 Thread Mai La
This patch consists of: - Enable PCI MSI as default for Bluestone board - Define number of MSI interrupt for Maui APM821xx SoC using in Bluestone board - Fix returning ENODEV as finding MSI node - Fix MSI physical high and low address - Keep MSI data logically Signed-off-by: Mai La m...@apm.com

[PATCH 2/2] powerpc/44x: Add PCI MSI node for Maui APM821xx SoC and Bluestone board in DTS

2012-03-08 Thread Mai La
Signed-off-by: Mai La m...@apm.com --- arch/powerpc/boot/dts/bluestone.dts | 24 1 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/bluestone.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/bluestone.dts index 2a56a0d..8ea6325 100644 ---

3.3.0-rc6-next-20120308 boot failure on POWER7 blade

2012-03-08 Thread Anton Blanchard
Hi, I'm seeing this on a POWER7 blade booting 3.3.0-rc6-next-20120308: PCI host bridge to bus :00 pci_bus :00: root bus resource [io 0x10-0x10] (bus address [0xf-0xf]) pci_bus :00: root bus resource [mem 0x3b00-0x3b001fff] (bus address [0xe000

Re: 3.3.0-rc6-next-20120308 boot failure on POWER7 blade

2012-03-08 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 14:25 +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote: Hi, I'm seeing this on a POWER7 blade booting 3.3.0-rc6-next-20120308: Looks like something that got fixed but the new patches from Bjorn aren't in next yet. I'll fwd you the patch separately to apply on top of what you have see

Re: [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/44x: Fix PCI MSI support for Maui APM821xx SoC and Bluestone board

2012-03-08 Thread Benjamin Herrenschmidt
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 10:17 +0700, Mai La wrote: This patch consists of: - Enable PCI MSI as default for Bluestone board - Define number of MSI interrupt for Maui APM821xx SoC using in Bluestone board - Fix returning ENODEV as finding MSI node - Fix MSI physical high and low address - Keep

Re: 3.3.0-rc6-next-20120308 boot failure on POWER7 blade

2012-03-08 Thread Anton Blanchard
Hi Ben, Looks like something that got fixed but the new patches from Bjorn aren't in next yet. I'll fwd you the patch separately to apply on top of what you have see if that helps (to confirm that's indeed the issue). Thanks, confirmed that it fixes it. Patch below in case anyone else is

linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the powerpc tree

2012-03-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi all, Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in arch/powerpc/platforms/iseries/setup.c between commit 8ee3e0d69623 (powerpc: Remove the main legacy iSerie platform code) from the powerpc tree and commit bd2f55361f18 (sched/rt: Use schedule_preempt_disabled()) from the tip tree.

linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the powerpc tree

2012-03-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Greg, Today's linux-next merge of the driver-core tree got a conflict in drivers/base/driver.c between commit fcd6f7620202 (driver-core: remove legacy iSeries hack) from the powerpc tree and commit 9875bb480cc8 (Eliminate get_driver() and put_driver()) from the driver-core tree. Just context

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the powerpc tree

2012-03-08 Thread David Miller
From: Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 13:36:46 +1100 Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/iseries_veth.c between commit e92a665949f6 (net: powerpc: remove the legacy iSeries ethernet driver) from the powerpc tree

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the powerpc tree

2012-03-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Dave, On Thu, 08 Mar 2012 22:15:34 -0800 (PST) David Miller da...@davemloft.net wrote: From: Stephen Rothwell s...@canb.auug.org.au Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 13:36:46 +1100 Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/iseries_veth.c between

linux-next: manual merge of the irqdomain tree with the powerpc tree

2012-03-08 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Grant, Today's linux-next merge of the irqdomain tree got a conflict in arch/powerpc/platforms/iseries/irq.c between commit 8ee3e0d69623 (powerpc: Remove the main legacy iSerie platform code) from the tree and three commits from the irqdomain tree. I just removed the file. -- Cheers,